Difference between revisions of "BCAL reconstruction 01/16/2012"
(→Z resolution) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Image:Sigma zdiff vs E point.png]] | [[Image:Sigma zdiff vs E point.png]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The curve shown is 1.5 cm/sqrt(E), which is already higher than the nominal z-position resolution sigma_z = 1.1 cm/sqrt(E) | ||
Something strange going on here ??? | Something strange going on here ??? | ||
| − | (z_point-z_truthcell) for a region near the top of the peak: | + | Look at (z_point-z_truthcell) for a region near the top of the peak: |
[[Image:Zdiff histo6.png]] | [[Image:Zdiff histo6.png]] | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 16 January 2012
Look at individual DBCALPoint = upstream hit + downstream hit in same BCAL cell, with energy corrected for attenuation, z determined by time difference of the two hits.
Can get "truth" information about how much energy deposited and where from DBCALTruthCell. Must sum several DBCALTruthCell to correspond with one DBCALPoint.
Compare DBCALPoint with summed DBCALTruthCell for corresponding cells.
Z resolution
Can look at z-resolution (z_point-z_truthcell) vs E_point:
Plot the sigmas of the (z_point-z_truthcell) distributions for different slices of E:
The curve shown is 1.5 cm/sqrt(E), which is already higher than the nominal z-position resolution sigma_z = 1.1 cm/sqrt(E)
Something strange going on here ???
Look at (z_point-z_truthcell) for a region near the top of the peak:
