Difference between revisions of "Start Counter Material Study"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
We have estimated the effect of the carbon fiber lining for the start counter support structure on the efficiency for detection for protons. Four reactions were studied:
+
We have estimated the effect of the carbon fiber lining for the start counter support structure on the efficiency for detection for protons. Four reactions of the form <math>\gamma p \rightarrow p X</math>were studied:
  
# b1pi: genr8, m<sub>X</sub> = 2.0 GeV, width = ??? GeV
+
# b1pi: genr8, m<sub>X</sub> = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 100 MeV
# bggen1
+
# bggen1: bggen, m<sub>X</sub> = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 0
# bggen2
+
# bggen2: bggen, m<sub>X</sub> = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 0
# bggen3
+
# bggen3: bggen, m<sub>X</sub> = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 0
  
 
For each reactions, two definitions of "detected" were considered:
 
For each reactions, two definitions of "detected" were considered:

Revision as of 00:57, 21 January 2014

We have estimated the effect of the carbon fiber lining for the start counter support structure on the efficiency for detection for protons. Four reactions of the form \gamma p\rightarrow pXwere studied:

  1. b1pi: genr8, mX = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 100 MeV
  2. bggen1: bggen, mX = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 0
  3. bggen2: bggen, mX = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 0
  4. bggen3: bggen, mX = 2.0 GeV, BW width = 0

For each reactions, two definitions of "detected" were considered:

  1. proton emerges from the start counter, with no requirement on momentum ("appeared")
  2. proton emerges from the start counter with at least 200 MeV/c of total momentum ("tracked")

The material budget is summarized as follows:

Start counter material.png

Also for each reaction, two detector conditions were considered:

  1. no carbon fiber support
  2. nominal (three layer) carbon fiber support

Range and energy loss were calculated using the ??? package. All relevant polar angles were considered. The effect of the magnetic field was not included in this estimate.

Two plots are shown for each reaction:

  1. momentum vs. polar angle, with the angle dependent cut for each of the following conditions
  2. "detection" efficiency with the corresponding angular distribution of events in arbitrary units

The colors indicate the definition of "detected" and the absence or presence of the carbon fiber:

  • appeared, no carbon fiber (blue)
  • appeared, with carbon fiber (red)
  • tracked, no carbon fiber (green)
  • tracked, with carbon fiber (black)
reaction p vs. theta efficiency
b1pi
momentum vs. polar angle, b1pi
detection efficiency, b1pi
bggen1
momentum vs. polar angle, bggen1
detection efficiency, bggen1
bggen2
momentum vs. polar angle, bggen2
detection efficiency, bggen2
bggen3
momentum vs. polar angle, bggen3
detection efficiency, bggen3

Integrated over all angles, the various definitions of detection and detector configurations give:

reaction appeared, no carbon fiber (blue) appeared, with carbon fiber (red) tracked, no carbon fiber (green) tracked, with carbon fiber (black)
b1pi 0.9386 0.9252 0.92285 0.90845
bggen1 0.7429 0.725 0.6724 0.6589
bggen2 0.7925 0.7749 0.73 0.7138
bggen3 1 1 1 1