Difference between revisions of "Inspection with an optical microscope"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Lamina Thick straw)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width="415pt"|[[Image:Lamina-thick-new.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Lamina-thick straw that was never used.]]
 
|width="415pt"|[[Image:Lamina-thick-new.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Lamina-thick straw that was never used.]]
|width="415pt"|[[Image:stone-thick-undersource.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Lamina thick straw that was irradiated.]]
+
|width="415pt"|[[Image:lamina-thick-undersource.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Lamina thick straw that was irradiated.]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
The straw is not transparent for light. The same results were obtained with light (underneath the sample) on/off.
 
The straw is not transparent for light. The same results were obtained with light (underneath the sample) on/off.

Revision as of 19:40, 12 March 2010

  1. All features that appeared in lines are in the direction of the wire spiral.
  2. Microscope has a light source underneath the sample


Stone kapton straw

Stone kapton straw that was never used.
Stone kapton straw that was irradiated.
Stone kapton straw, used for 3 years.

Although it appears the the straw that was irradiated shows more holes - It appears to me that it depends more on the piece of straw (chance) than irradiation (as this effect is not seen in the Lamina-thin straw).


Lamina thin straw

Lamina-thin straw that was never used.
Lamina thin straw that was irradiated.

No extra holes after irradiation are observed.


Lamina Thick straw

Lamina-thick straw that was never used.
Lamina thick straw that was irradiated.

The straw is not transparent for light. The same results were obtained with light (underneath the sample) on/off.