Difference between revisions of "FCAL Reconstruction 04/08/2012"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Energy resolution)
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
1-block "clusters" will collect less energy than multi-block clusters of same photon energy-->will affect energy calibration, energy resolution
 
1-block "clusters" will collect less energy than multi-block clusters of same photon energy-->will affect energy calibration, energy resolution
 
==FCAL energy corrections==
 
What's the deal with FCAL energy correction? current code by Mihajlo ([http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1093 DocDB 1093]) what does this adjust for? attenuation? lack of full containment?
 
 
Assume form[[File:Nonlin energy corr eq.png]], where E_c is the energy of clustered blocks and E_gamma is the energy of thrown photon.
 
 
Fit MC data for A,B,C,<math>\epsilon</math>.
 
 
In reconstruction, get E_corrected from E_clust by solving this equation iteratively.
 
  
 
==Energy resolution==
 
==Energy resolution==
Line 43: Line 34:
  
 
Fit to red curve says sigma(E) = 6.4%/sqrt(E) ⊕ 1.9%
 
Fit to red curve says sigma(E) = 6.4%/sqrt(E) ⊕ 1.9%
 +
 +
 +
==FCAL energy corrections==
 +
What's the deal with FCAL energy correction? current code by Mihajlo ([http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=1093 DocDB 1093]) what does this adjust for? attenuation? lack of full containment?
 +
 +
Assume form[[File:Nonlin energy corr eq.png]], where E_c is the energy of clustered blocks and E_gamma is the energy of thrown photon.
 +
 +
Fit MC data for A,B,C,<math>\epsilon</math>.
 +
 +
In reconstruction, get E_corrected from E_clust by solving this equation iteratively.

Revision as of 22:04, 8 April 2012

There is a tunable parameter in the FCAL code with default:

MIN_CLUSTER_BLOCK_COUNT = 2;

At lower energies (<~500 MeV), this causes photon reconstruction efficiency to be lower because often only one block has energy deposited in it (above the 20 MeV threshold in mcsmear).

In single photon sample:

SinglePhotonFCAL.recon eff.minBlock1+minBlock2.svn8951.png

  • red: MIN_CLUSTER_BLOCK_COUNT = 1
  • black: MIN_CLUSTER_BLOCK_COUNT = 2

In b1pi events:

  • Overall efficiency increases by ~6%: 78% -> 84%
  • 15% in total photon count (after timing cut) (1.18->1.36)

1-block "clusters" will collect less energy than multi-block clusters of same photon energy-->will affect energy calibration, energy resolution

Energy resolution

Using current calibration coefficients:

SinglePhotonFCAL.mean E err.minBlock1+minBlock2.svn8951.png

SinglePhotonFCAL.sigma E err.minBlock1+minBlock2.svn8951.png

Fit to black curve says sigma(E) = 6.1%/sqrt(E) ⊕ 1.9%

Using same calibration scheme, but readjust coefficients for single block clusters

[[]]

[[]]

Fit to red curve says sigma(E) = 6.4%/sqrt(E) ⊕ 1.9%


FCAL energy corrections

What's the deal with FCAL energy correction? current code by Mihajlo (DocDB 1093) what does this adjust for? attenuation? lack of full containment?

Assume formNonlin energy corr eq.png, where E_c is the energy of clustered blocks and E_gamma is the energy of thrown photon.

Fit MC data for A,B,C,\epsilon .

In reconstruction, get E_corrected from E_clust by solving this equation iteratively.