Difference between revisions of "BCAL reconstruction 9/21/11"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
** kinematic fit to pi0 requires errors | ** kinematic fit to pi0 requires errors | ||
*** Made some changes to error calculation, still error in phi is overestimated by 25% | *** Made some changes to error calculation, still error in phi is overestimated by 25% | ||
| − | |||
*** Suggestions? | *** Suggestions? | ||
==Issues== | ==Issues== | ||
| − | * Deterior in time resolution/energy resolution/etc. when changing from FINE to 1234 summing. How much is inevitable and how much due to | + | * Deterior in time resolution/energy resolution/etc. when changing from FINE to 1234 summing. How much is inevitable and how much due to unoptimized algorithm? |
** Decouple c | ** Decouple c | ||
* How to deal with stuff at the very forward edge of BCAL? | * How to deal with stuff at the very forward edge of BCAL? | ||
Latest revision as of 13:34, 21 September 2011
Update
- Modified DBCALGeometry to allow 1234 summing (not checked in)
- Can easily switch between 1234/334/whatever configurations
- Breaks KLOE algorithm at the moment (worth fixing?)
- pi0 reconstruction/fitting
- created a sample of events with a single pi0
- kinematic fit to pi0 requires errors
- Made some changes to error calculation, still error in phi is overestimated by 25%
- Suggestions?
Issues
- Deterior in time resolution/energy resolution/etc. when changing from FINE to 1234 summing. How much is inevitable and how much due to unoptimized algorithm?
- Decouple c
- How to deal with stuff at the very forward edge of BCAL?
