Difference between revisions of "BCAL reconstruction 9/21/11"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
** Can easily switch between 1234/334/whatever configurations | ** Can easily switch between 1234/334/whatever configurations | ||
** Breaks KLOE algorithm at the moment (worth fixing?) | ** Breaks KLOE algorithm at the moment (worth fixing?) | ||
| − | * | + | * pi0 reconstruction/fitting |
| − | ** Made some changes, still error in phi is overestimated by 25% | + | ** created a sample of events with a single pi0 |
| − | ** Ordering of showers? | + | ** kinematic fit to pi0 requires errors |
| − | ** Suggestions? | + | *** Made some changes to error calculation, still error in phi is overestimated by 25% |
| + | *** Ordering of showers? | ||
| + | *** Suggestions? | ||
==Issues== | ==Issues== | ||
Revision as of 13:31, 21 September 2011
Update
- Modified DBCALGeometry to allow 1234 summing (not checked in)
- Can easily switch between 1234/334/whatever configurations
- Breaks KLOE algorithm at the moment (worth fixing?)
- pi0 reconstruction/fitting
- created a sample of events with a single pi0
- kinematic fit to pi0 requires errors
- Made some changes to error calculation, still error in phi is overestimated by 25%
- Ordering of showers?
- Suggestions?
Issues
- Deterior in time resolution/energy resolution/etc. when changing from FINE to 1234 summing. How much is inevitable and how much due to unoptimal algorithm?
- Decouple c
- How to deal with stuff at the very forward edge of BCAL?
