Difference between revisions of "BCAL reconstruction 11/28/11"

Revision as of 18:45, 28 November 2011

Update

• 1234 segmentation now an option in reconstruction code
• New algorithm comparable to or better than KLOE algorithm in most tests I tried
  • Single photon events: (much) better timing resolution, better angular resolution, same energy resolution, but more extraneous clusters
  • Single pi0 events: ~5% more pi0's reconstructed
  • b1pi events: slightly more pi0's reconstructed
• Will be checked in soon
• Issues
  • pi0 reconstruction:
  • better errors
  • FCAL issues?

Changes

• More flexible DBCALGeometry allows 1234 summing (checked-in)
• Change weighting when averaging quantities to form cluster
• Improve error estimation
• Tune parameters
• Fix various bugs
• Change in KLOE algorithm to min energy threshold of cluster to make the two algorithms match

Single photon event sample

• 45000 events
  • energy uniformly distributed from .05-2.05 GeV
  • angles from 10.8-118
• to exclude events with photon conversion, etc., only look at events with a "primary" DBCALTruthShower (81% of events)
• all results with 1234 summing.

Efficiency

efficiency of reconstructing at least one shower with abs(phi-phi_thrown)<.06 rad: >99.5% for both algorithms.

Energy resolution

• looking at "raw" energies of shower

energy resolution vs. thrown photon E

• Glux:
• KLOE:

KLOE collects more BCAL hits in a shower->less negative mean

Corrected energy resolution?

Timing resolution

For KLOE algorithm, shower time t is just weighted average of hit times (?).

For GlueX algorithm, t is time to inner radius.

Look at t0=t-t_travel, where t_travel is the time it takes for a photon to travel from center of target to shower position (x,y,z) (for KLOE algorithm) or to inner radius (GlueX algorithm)

GlueX:

KLOE:

new algorithm has much better timing resolutions

• Mostly due to weighting average of hit times by E^2 (hit energy squared) rather than E
• Averaging times at inner radius rather than at hit position doesn't make much difference

distributions above not centered at 0

• not really sure why

Angular resolution

How well can we reconstruct shower theta (or equivalently z)?

GlueX:

KLOE:

GlueX algorithm has better resolution

Number of showers reconstructed

Average # of showers reconstructed:

• GlueX: 1.39
• KLOE: 1.05

New algorithm has more extraneous showers in the single photon sample. I think this is because this algorithm doesn't merge clusters that are close in phi but separated in theta. This is something that can be still be worked on, but it doesn't seem urgent since this algorithm has fewer extraneous clusters in the other samples.

Single pi0 event sample

~64000 pi0's isolated from a bggen sample using extract_ptype_hddm plugin.

Again exclude any events with tracking hits.

Hard to get an exact count of how many pi0's are reconstructed/reconstructable, so I tried two different methods.

Method 1

Use DTwoGammaFit to fit two photons to pi0 mass. The problem with this is that it relies on having correct errors, which we don't quite have yet.

Just count the number of events where there is a pi0 fit with confidence level > 10%.

• GlueX algorithm: 37163 good pi0 fits : 72% efficiency (excluding events with tracking hits)
• KLOE algorithm: 34322 good pi0 fits : 66% efficiency

Energy and angular resolutions are roughly the same

Method 2

Look at the two most energetic photons in an event. If the combined four-momentum falls "close" to the thrown pi0 four-momentum, count this a "good" reconstructed pi0.

• GlueX: 38342 good pi0's=74% efficiency
• KLOE: 36083 good pi0's=70% efficiency

b1pi event sample

10000 b1pi events from genr8.

Can count the number of reconstructed BCAL photons "close" to thrown photons.

• GlueX: 8266 "good" reconsructed BCAL photons/120
• KLOE:

Vertex spread.

334 Segmentation

Things

• Errors/pi0 kinfit funniness
• Cluster overlap function tweaks -> better energy resolution
• Theta res distributions off-center
• Very forward particles energy calibration, general energy calibration scheme
• Extra showers at ~12 deg, low energy
• What is cluster rho good for?