Difference between revisions of "08/19/2020"
From GlueXWiki
(Created page with "Present: M.D., A.D., S.Š, J.S., General: PAC approved the experiment for 33 days with A<sup>-</sup> rating. S.Š: J.S.: M.D.: A.D.:") |
m |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Present: M.D., A.D., S.Š, J.S., | Present: M.D., A.D., S.Š, J.S., | ||
| − | General: PAC approved the experiment for 33 days with A<sup>-</sup> rating. | + | General: |
| + | *PAC approved the experiment for 33 days with A<sup>-</sup> rating. | ||
| + | *Eugene's comments on PAC | ||
| + | *Move GDH meeting? | ||
| + | S.Š: Wrote to Ilya. Waiting for his answer. | ||
| − | + | J.S.: | |
| − | + | ||
| − | J.S.: | + | |
M.D.: | M.D.: | ||
A.D.: | A.D.: | ||
| + | *Need a plan to move forward | ||
| + | **Invite non-GlueX collaborators? | ||
| + | ***T. Averett, J. P. Chen, T. Holmstrom, C. Peng and X. Zheng have expressed wishes to join. | ||
| + | ***Other people that may be interested: G. Cates, H. Gao, K. Griffioen, S. Kuhn, Z-E. Mezziani, M. Ripani, A. Sandorfi, K. Slifer. People from Ljubljana, Mainz, W&M? | ||
| + | **Target | ||
| + | ***$600k. Where do the funds come from? Most likely JLab capital equipment. | ||
| + | ***Manpower: target group. | ||
| + | ***Timeline? Will determine when we can say we are ready to run. | ||
| + | ***Should we organise a meeting with C. Keith? | ||
| + | **Helicity reporting equipment | ||
| + | ***$50k Hall D/Accelerator ops funds? | ||
| + | ***Manpower Hall D/Accelerator | ||
| + | ***Mark to set-up a meeting with Hall D/accelerator people. Maybe after the summer 2020 run. | ||
| + | **Upgrade of the Pair Spectrometer acceptance | ||
| + | **Other special equipment (possibly) needed? | ||
| + | ***Beam hardener | ||
| + | ***Look into having an Al. radiator of RL between 2. 10^-5, 10^-4, so that we have some beam current flexibility. | ||
| + | ***Push accelerator into developing solutions for suppressing beam bleedthrough. | ||
| + | **Tests with beam: | ||
| + | ***Rate check on plastic/carbon targets (Nuclear Compton, B-H)? Rational: use a well-known target thickness with well defined vertex. | ||
| + | ***Trigger optimisation studies? | ||
| + | **Low energy run | ||
| + | **Students | ||
Latest revision as of 13:48, 1 September 2020
Present: M.D., A.D., S.Š, J.S.,
General:
- PAC approved the experiment for 33 days with A- rating.
- Eugene's comments on PAC
- Move GDH meeting?
S.Š: Wrote to Ilya. Waiting for his answer.
J.S.:
M.D.:
A.D.:
- Need a plan to move forward
- Invite non-GlueX collaborators?
- T. Averett, J. P. Chen, T. Holmstrom, C. Peng and X. Zheng have expressed wishes to join.
- Other people that may be interested: G. Cates, H. Gao, K. Griffioen, S. Kuhn, Z-E. Mezziani, M. Ripani, A. Sandorfi, K. Slifer. People from Ljubljana, Mainz, W&M?
- Target
- $600k. Where do the funds come from? Most likely JLab capital equipment.
- Manpower: target group.
- Timeline? Will determine when we can say we are ready to run.
- Should we organise a meeting with C. Keith?
- Helicity reporting equipment
- $50k Hall D/Accelerator ops funds?
- Manpower Hall D/Accelerator
- Mark to set-up a meeting with Hall D/accelerator people. Maybe after the summer 2020 run.
- Upgrade of the Pair Spectrometer acceptance
- Other special equipment (possibly) needed?
- Beam hardener
- Look into having an Al. radiator of RL between 2. 10^-5, 10^-4, so that we have some beam current flexibility.
- Push accelerator into developing solutions for suppressing beam bleedthrough.
- Tests with beam:
- Rate check on plastic/carbon targets (Nuclear Compton, B-H)? Rational: use a well-known target thickness with well defined vertex.
- Trigger optimisation studies?
- Low energy run
- Students
- Invite non-GlueX collaborators?
