06/17/2020
From GlueXWiki
Revision as of 07:50, 17 June 2020 by Deurpam (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "Present: M.D., A.D., S.Š General: **Quorum: do we need to write a GDH-specific appeal letter? **Elton's comments (only one from the collaboration so far). *M.D: **Provid...")
Present: M.D., A.D., S.Š
General:
- Quorum: do we need to write a GDH-specific appeal letter?
- Elton's comments (only one from the collaboration so far).
- M.D:
- Provided estimate for the trigger rates and trigger+tagger rates from BH and Compton. Large rates are found, limiting our DAQ rate and reducing our stats by a factor of 0.36.
- Implemented some of Elton's comments.
- S.Š:
- J. S.:
- A. D.:
- Wrote to the collaboration re. new version of the proposal. (No reply at all.)
- Added a small discussion on polarized background (Polarized Compton background is nearly fully suppressed because of the GDH SR on electron and because it's integrant is significant only near the electron mass << our nu)
- Implemented Mark's results on BH and Compton background in the proposal. In particular, we now have a decent section on unpolarized backgrounds rather than a space-holder.
- Updated the figures, photon flux used, accidental background, precision reached, run-time discussions to account of the ~2/3 drop in statistics.
- We now propose to run 10 days at 4 GeV instead of 5 days (12 GeV run remains at 17 days).
- Implemented some of Elton comments left after Mark's pass at them.
- Starting to work on additional forms for the proposal.
