Photon Reconstruction in b1pi events 02/10/2012

From GlueXWiki
Revision as of 16:56, 13 February 2012 by Wilevine (Talk | contribs) (Reconstructed photons)

Jump to: navigation, search

BCAL

Thrown photons

Look at the distribution of decay photons from the pi0.

For comparison with reconstructed data, useful to look at z rather than theta. This is the z that the photon would reach the inner radius of the BCAL, given its momentum and vertex.

PhotonEvsZ thrown BCAL.png

PhotonZ thrown BCAL.png

Reconstructed photons

Spectrum of reconstructed "photons": exclude clusters that can be matched to a charged track.

PhotonEvsZ recon BCAL.png

PhotonZ recon BCAL.png

Where does each of these peaks come from?

  • Broad peak around 125 cm due to protons?
  • Peaks at upstream and downstream ends of detector from noise that cause garbage timing info?
  • Other three sharp peaks? Look like FDC structure, but spacing is not right?

Cuts

  • A timing cut fabs(t_shower-t_flight) < 1 ns can be applied to remove many of the extra "photons". (Red curve below)
  • I don't think low energy showers are well understood at the moment, so remove clusters with E<60 MeV. (Green)
  • Also, cut out a problem area at forward angles and lower energies (E<150 MeV && z>300 cm) (Blue)

More work needed to optimize cuts.

PhotonZ recon cuts BCAL.png

With all cuts:

PhotonEvsZ recon cuts BCAL.png

Number of "photons" decreases from 60,000 to 17,000.

Two gamma invariant Mass

Look at pairs of 2 BCAL photons and 1 BCAL+1 FCAL photon, with the cuts described above. Using truth vertex information.

Compare KLOE algorithm to GlueX algorithm.

Photon two gamma invariant mass .png

Black is KLOE, red is GlueX. Fits are to gaussian + straight line.

GlueX has less background, the fit also indicates that it has a taller peak, but I don't know how much this fit can really be trusted.