Difference between revisions of "Controls To Do List"
From GlueXWiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* '''Should we use ControlNet as well as Ethernet/IP in the hall?''' | * '''Should we use ControlNet as well as Ethernet/IP in the hall?''' | ||
| − | ** ''Notes'' | + | ** '''''Notes''''' |
*** Is there really a network reliability problem? | *** Is there really a network reliability problem? | ||
*** Would we have to run a copper line to the counting house? | *** Would we have to run a copper line to the counting house? | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* '''When should we use a PC104 vs an IOC on a PC vs direct PLC control?''' | * '''When should we use a PC104 vs an IOC on a PC vs direct PLC control?''' | ||
| − | ** ''Notes'' | + | ** '''''Notes''''' |
*** Should the FDC gas system use just PLC control and not use a PC104? | *** Should the FDC gas system use just PLC control and not use a PC104? | ||
Revision as of 12:07, 3 June 2011
- Should we use ControlNet as well as Ethernet/IP in the hall?
- Notes
- Is there really a network reliability problem?
- Would we have to run a copper line to the counting house?
- Should we use an additional PLC in the hall?
- Should we locate the main PLC in the hall?
- Resolution
- Bryan and Brent say the high-class switches we will use in the hall are extremely reliable, as reliable as the PLC itself, so there doesn't seem to be a good reason to use ControlNet.
- Still To Do
- Test what happens if an Ethernet cable is unplugged.
- Notes
- When should we use a PC104 vs an IOC on a PC vs direct PLC control?
- Notes
- Should the FDC gas system use just PLC control and not use a PC104?
- Notes
