Difference between revisions of "Controls To Do List"
From GlueXWiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ===Should we use ControlNet as well as Ethernet/IP in the hall?=== | + | ====Should we use ControlNet as well as Ethernet/IP in the hall?==== |
| − | + | * '''Notes''' | |
| − | + | ** Is there really a network reliability problem? | |
| − | + | ** Would we have to run a copper line to the counting house? | |
| − | + | ** Should we use an additional PLC in the hall? | |
| − | + | ** Should we locate the main PLC in the hall? | |
| − | + | * '''Resolution''' | |
| − | + | ** Bryan and Brent say the high-class switches we will use in the hall are extremely reliable, as reliable as the PLC itself. | |
| − | + | ==== When should we use a PC104 vs an IOC on a PC vs direct PLC control?==== | |
| − | + | * '''Notes''' | |
| − | + | ** Should the FDC gas system use just PLC control and not use a PC104? | |
Revision as of 12:00, 3 June 2011
Should we use ControlNet as well as Ethernet/IP in the hall?
- Notes
- Is there really a network reliability problem?
- Would we have to run a copper line to the counting house?
- Should we use an additional PLC in the hall?
- Should we locate the main PLC in the hall?
- Resolution
- Bryan and Brent say the high-class switches we will use in the hall are extremely reliable, as reliable as the PLC itself.
When should we use a PC104 vs an IOC on a PC vs direct PLC control?
- Notes
- Should the FDC gas system use just PLC control and not use a PC104?
