Difference between revisions of "Topics for the 2015 Software Review"

Revision as of 13:09, 17 January 2015

data acquisitions successes
- transfer bandwidth
- Event rates, how to improve
- Event sizes, how to improve
- rosbustness of system
- Handle corrupted evio data
Revist data spreadsheet from a year ago
offline monitoring
- browser
- analyze data as it appears on the silo
- reconstruction results
calibration committee
- bi-weekly meeting
- preliminary list of constants compiled
- calibration still needs to be regularized
- calibration database training
CCDB successes
- command line interface
- SQLite form of database
analysis results
- electron identification in the FCAL.
- pi0 peak
- proton id with tof
- rho meson in pi+ pi-
- omega meson in pi+ pi- pi0
data transfer to CMU via globus Online
data management: event store, etc.
stealth data challenge on real data

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+# Report on Successful Data Challenges
+#* DC1 - December 2012/ January 2013
+#** 5 billion Events - OSG, JLab, CMU
+#** 1200 Concurrent Jobs at JLab.
+#* DC2 - March/April 2014
+#** 10 billion events with EM backgrounds included - OSG, JLab, MIT, CMU, FSU
+#** 4500 Concurrent Jobs at JLab
+#** Well under 0.1% failure rate
+#* Stealth Online Data Challenge
+#** Running in Fall 2014
+#** Full DAQ chain to local raid disk, transfer to tape, and automatic processing from tape.
+#** ~500 million events.
+#* DC3 - January/February 2015
+#** Read data in raw-event format from tape and produce to DST (REST) files.
+#** Load up as many JLab cores as possible.
+#** Run Multi-threaded jobs
 * data acquisitions successes
 ** transfer bandwidth