Difference between revisions of "Time-of-Flight/Start-Counter Meeting, May 1, 2009"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replacement - "http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex" to "https://halldweb.jlab.org")
 
Line 25: Line 25:
 
==Start Counter Design==
 
==Start Counter Design==
  
Sascha and Seema's [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/gluex/DocDB/0012/001241/001/sc_simu.pdf GlueX note on the start counter rates] is available. Sascha noted that for forward going tracks could encounter a large amount of material if they cross the start counter upstream of the bend in the counters and that perhaps we should move that point farther back. Tim mentioned that the current geometry has not been optimized. More study will be needed.
+
Sascha and Seema's [https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0012/001241/001/sc_simu.pdf GlueX note on the start counter rates] is available. Sascha noted that for forward going tracks could encounter a large amount of material if they cross the start counter upstream of the bend in the counters and that perhaps we should move that point farther back. Tim mentioned that the current geometry has not been optimized. More study will be needed.

Latest revision as of 12:39, 14 March 2017

Location, Time

Friday, May 1, 2009
3:00 pm EDT
JLab: CEBAF Center, Room F326/327
ESNet: 8542553
EVO: direct meeting link
Conference Group: 800-377-8846, participant code: 39527048

Agenda

  1. Time-of-Flight Status: Paul
  2. Start Counter Status: Werner
  3. Schedules
  4. Next meeting time

Minutes

Present: Beni, Mark, Simon, Chuck, Tim, Sascha S.

TOF and Start Counter Schedule

Chuck has put schedules into Fastrack for both systems. Tim is in the process of reviewing them. There are still lots of details to fill-in/correct. Chuck will send tell us how to find the current version.

Start Counter Design

Sascha and Seema's GlueX note on the start counter rates is available. Sascha noted that for forward going tracks could encounter a large amount of material if they cross the start counter upstream of the bend in the counters and that perhaps we should move that point farther back. Tim mentioned that the current geometry has not been optimized. More study will be needed.