Difference between revisions of "Task Prioritization Ideas"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Proposal: classify tasks and/or sub-tasks as | Proposal: classify tasks and/or sub-tasks as | ||
{|border | {|border | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! stove scheme !! grammatical scheme !! numeric scheme | ||
|- | |- | ||
|front-burner || must || priority 1 | |front-burner || must || priority 1 | ||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 7 October 2009
Proposal: classify tasks and/or sub-tasks as
| stove scheme | grammatical scheme | numeric scheme |
|---|---|---|
| front-burner | must | priority 1 |
| middle-burner | should | priority 2 |
| back-burner | like | priority 3 |
Notes:
- priority 1: need the answer yesterday, crucial for planning
- priority 2: will eventually have to get done, any progress is work saved in the future
- priority 3: would be nice to have, can be delayed, long-term benefits
Manpower:
- priority 1: manpower needs to be allocated now, reports to group given frequently
- priority 2: appropriate to assign to new collaborators or others looking for projects
- priority 3: no manpower should be assigned
Current priority 1 items:
- need to map magnet
- multi-track, multi-photon events
- charge division in the CDC
