Difference between revisions of "Run Planning Meeting Notes, March 11 - march 15, 2024"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Tuesday, March 12 2024)
(Tuesday, March 12 2024)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* 23:30 Although the first amorphous radiator motion was normal, [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265142 it got stuck in its way to get retracted.]
 
* 23:30 Although the first amorphous radiator motion was normal, [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265142 it got stuck in its way to get retracted.]
 
** Hovanes reduced motor speed to 30% of nominal
 
** Hovanes reduced motor speed to 30% of nominal
** We decided to drop the program on 10<sup>-4</sup> and 3*10<sup>-4</sup> RL radiators, as well as Ion Chambers threshold calib. on those. We also drop the plan for our Harp scan since it uses the same motor.  
+
** We decided to drop the program on 10<sup>-4</sup> and 3×10<sup>-4</sup> RL radiators, as well as Ion Chambers threshold calib. on those. We also drop the plan for our Harp scan since it uses the same motor.  
 
* 01:05 [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265328 radiator motion issue again despite reduced speed]
 
* 01:05 [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265328 radiator motion issue again despite reduced speed]
* 03:20 Ion Chamber calibration done (2*10<sup>-5</sup> radiator only because of motor issue)
+
* 03:20 Ion Chamber calibration done (2×10<sup>-5</sup> radiator only because of motor issue)
 
* 05:20 Active Collimator calibration done (high gain only because of radiator motor issue)
 
* 05:20 Active Collimator calibration done (high gain only because of radiator motor issue)
 +
* Transmission looks decent: 5kHz rate in the PSC counters compared to expected 8.7kHz for optimal, converging, beam (100 nA, 2×10<sup>-5</sup> RL 750um TPOL converter)
  
*MCC Harp scans: [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265217 5C00], [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265288 5C11], [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265289 5C11b]
+
*MCC Harp scans: [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265217 5C00], [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265288 5C11], [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4265289 5C11b]. They are decent.
  
  
Line 20: Line 21:
  
  
* ABUs:   h
+
* ABUs: 0 h
 
<!-- * Data Summary:  B triggers on empty target -->
 
<!-- * Data Summary:  B triggers on empty target -->
  

Revision as of 08:21, 12 March 2024

Tuesday, March 12 2024

Past 24 hours

  • 6:37 LCW fluctuation tripped PS magnet.
  • Hall C pass change completed early afternoon. Then, Ops started to tune hall D beam.
  • 17:30 Ops starting to tune beam to Hall D tagger.
  • 23:30 Although the first amorphous radiator motion was normal, it got stuck in its way to get retracted.
    • Hovanes reduced motor speed to 30% of nominal
    • We decided to drop the program on 10-4 and 3×10-4 RL radiators, as well as Ion Chambers threshold calib. on those. We also drop the plan for our Harp scan since it uses the same motor.
  • 01:05 radiator motion issue again despite reduced speed
  • 03:20 Ion Chamber calibration done (2×10-5 radiator only because of motor issue)
  • 05:20 Active Collimator calibration done (high gain only because of radiator motor issue)
  • Transmission looks decent: 5kHz rate in the PSC counters compared to expected 8.7kHz for optimal, converging, beam (100 nA, 2×10-5 RL 750um TPOL converter)



  • ABUs: 0 h

Issues


  • Questions:
    • Access to tagger to look at amorphous radiator/harp motor?
    • Man shifts for Friday day/swing?


Plan