Difference between revisions of "Run Planning Meeting Notes, Feb 16-Feb 22, 2017"
From GlueXWiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#* Stable accelerator running over the last 24 hours | #* Stable accelerator running over the last 24 hours | ||
#* Harp scans: | #* Harp scans: | ||
| − | #** MCC scans [ | + | #** MCC scans [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3458630 before] and [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3458638 after] Todd's script |
#***"Good enough -- horizontal convergence is nearly spot on, and vertical convergence is a little shallow but ok." | #***"Good enough -- horizontal convergence is nearly spot on, and vertical convergence is a little shallow but ok." | ||
| − | #** Our scan: [ | + | #** Our scan: [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3458624 before] and [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3458635 after] Todd's script |
#** In terms of (Sigma_X, Sigma_Y) at 5C11, 5C11B and radiator: | #** In terms of (Sigma_X, Sigma_Y) at 5C11, 5C11B and radiator: | ||
#*** Before: (1.31, 0.63), (1.08, 0.73), (1.03, 0.41) | #*** Before: (1.31, 0.63), (1.08, 0.73), (1.03, 0.41) | ||
#*** After : (1.07, 0.51), (0.79, 0.50), (0.78, 0.32) | #*** After : (1.07, 0.51), (0.79, 0.50), (0.78, 0.32) | ||
| − | #* Convergence studies from Hovanes: [ | + | #* Convergence studies from Hovanes: [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3458654 Feb 15] vs [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3458258 Feb 9] |
#** Beam sigma at the radiator: 0.6cm (Feb 15) vs 0.5cm (Feb 9) | #** Beam sigma at the radiator: 0.6cm (Feb 15) vs 0.5cm (Feb 9) | ||
#*** "... uncertainties ... a lot larger compared to Feb 9. It is hard to make any conclusions about the improvement of the spot." | #*** "... uncertainties ... a lot larger compared to Feb 9. It is hard to make any conclusions about the improvement of the spot." | ||
Revision as of 07:20, 16 February 2017
<- Back to Run Coordination Meetings: Spring 2017 Run
Thursday, February 16
- Accelerator Status
- Stable accelerator running over the last 24 hours
- Harp scans:
- MCC scans before and after Todd's script
- "Good enough -- horizontal convergence is nearly spot on, and vertical convergence is a little shallow but ok."
- Our scan: before and after Todd's script
- In terms of (Sigma_X, Sigma_Y) at 5C11, 5C11B and radiator:
- Before: (1.31, 0.63), (1.08, 0.73), (1.03, 0.41)
- After : (1.07, 0.51), (0.79, 0.50), (0.78, 0.32)
- MCC scans before and after Todd's script
- Convergence studies from Hovanes: Feb 15 vs Feb 9
- Beam sigma at the radiator: 0.6cm (Feb 15) vs 0.5cm (Feb 9)
- "... uncertainties ... a lot larger compared to Feb 9. It is hard to make any conclusions about the improvement of the spot."
- Beam sigma at the radiator: 0.6cm (Feb 15) vs 0.5cm (Feb 9)
- Hall-D/GlueX items
- RootSpy tips:
- Restarting cMsg server: [1]
- RootSpy tips:
- Monitoring
- Run Plan
- Production data
- Hall safety walk-through is supposed to happen between 7:00 AM and 7:30 AM
- Offline Analysis?
- Any Other Business?
