Difference between revisions of "Run Coordinator report: Summer 2020 w8"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dung the last 6 days of the beam, we took production data and carried out two tests: PS ans CCAL. The downtime was 10.4hrs | Dung the last 6 days of the beam, we took production data and carried out two tests: PS ans CCAL. The downtime was 10.4hrs | ||
| + | |||
#*Physics production: total 18.06B - perp 8.18B para 7.86B amo 2.02B | #*Physics production: total 18.06B - perp 8.18B para 7.86B amo 2.02B | ||
#*PS study for flux normalization | #*PS study for flux normalization | ||
#*CCAL test with 2nA beam to test new dividers | #*CCAL test with 2nA beam to test new dividers | ||
| + | |||
The most notable issues were | The most notable issues were | ||
| + | |||
#* Goniometer controler board has to be replaced | #* Goniometer controler board has to be replaced | ||
#* It was difficult to nudge the coherent peak probably because the diamond degraded | #* It was difficult to nudge the coherent peak probably because the diamond degraded | ||
#* Few FCAL bases have to be replaced | #* Few FCAL bases have to be replaced | ||
Revision as of 09:05, 6 October 2020
RC summary, 09/17/2020 - 09/21/2020, Igal Jaegle
Dung the last 6 days of the beam, we took production data and carried out two tests: PS ans CCAL. The downtime was 10.4hrs
- Physics production: total 18.06B - perp 8.18B para 7.86B amo 2.02B
- PS study for flux normalization
- CCAL test with 2nA beam to test new dividers
The most notable issues were
- Goniometer controler board has to be replaced
- It was difficult to nudge the coherent peak probably because the diamond degraded
- Few FCAL bases have to be replaced
