RunPeriod-2022-08 Validation

From GlueXWiki
Revision as of 10:55, 26 March 2024 by Sdobbs (Talk | contribs) (Notes from Beni)

Jump to: navigation, search


Run List


Monitoring Launch Checks

Team members

  • BCAL: Zisis Papandreou/Regina + Tolga Erbora
  • CCAL: Drew Smith
  • CDC: Alison Laduke
  • FCAL: Susan Schadmand
  • FDC: Dene Hoffman
  • PS/PSC: Susan Schadmand
  • SC: Viviana Arroyave
  • TAGH/TAGM: Saheli Rakshit
  • TOF: Jesse Hernandez
  • Timing: Nizar Septian
  • Analysis: Zach Baldwin


Detector/Calibration Experts

  • BCAL: Mark Dalton, Zisis Papandreou, Igal Jaegle
  • CCAL: Drew Smith
  • CDC: Naomi Jarvis
  • FCAL: Mark Dalton, Malte Albrecht, Igal Jaegle
  • FDC: Lubomir Pentchev
  • PS/PSC: Alex Somov, Olga Cortes
  • SC: Beni Zihlmann
  • TAGH: Alex Somov, Bo Yu
  • TAGM: Richard Jones, Ellie Prather
  • TOF: Paul Eugenio, Beni Zihlmann
  • Timing: Sean Dobbs
  • Analysis: Igal Jaegle


Monitoring Status

Detector Monitoring Expert checks
BCAL in progress pending
CCAL done done
CDC done done
FCAL Timing, Occupancy, and pi0 Peak: done pending
FDC done pending
PS/PSC Timing, Occupancy, and PS pair energy: done pending
SC done pending
TAGH/TAGM done pending
TOF done pending
Timing done done
Analysis DONE pending

Data monitoring

Notes

  • 110675 low CDC efficiency - fine in v12
  • 110695 low CDC efficiency (no plot) - fine in v12
  • 110790 low CDC efficiency - fine in v12
  • 111269 low CDC efficiency - fine in v12
  • 111664 low CDC efficiency - fine in v12

Problem runs

ver13 monitoring launch

  • Runs to ignore: 110469, 110485, 110486 - marked as bad
  • Run 111771 - looks like SC electronics weren't correctly initialized - marked as bad
  • This is a weird one (two) on the latest monitoring - 111404, 111405 - calibrations mostly seem okay, but the rate of good events is low. I think that the rate is thrown off by the bad FCAL fADC - could consider just tossing this run.
    • 111694 also seems driven by a noisy fADC
    • all three marked as bad
  • Problematic TAGM channel: 64
  • These runs should have been marked as solenoid off, but were not - this is fixed now - 110469-110482, 110600-110621, 111969-112001

Notes from Beni

  • 110447-110485 - NO DATA: why are these runs in reconstruction? - check next launch
  • 110600-110621 - NO DATA: same? - check next launch
  • 110535 - LOW STATISTICS
  • 110987-110990 - MISSING SHORT PADDLES VERTICAL PLANE DOWN: HV trip? - bad fADC, rejecting these runs
  • 111206 - LOW STATISTICS
  • 111290 - LOW STATISTICS
  • 111404-111405 - NO DATA: ONLY INNERMOST FCAL RING SEEN? TRIGGER? - thrown out for trigger problems
  • 111430 - LOW STATISTCIS
  • 111694 - NO DATA: SAME AS 111404-111405
  • 111771 - GOOD: ALL OK - run rejected for other reasons above
  • 111969-112001 - NO DATA

Additional comments on low statistics runs

run 110535 according to the log book the beam was off for quite some time and they did not stop the run. So the first files contain a lot of just cosmic triggers: logbook excerpt: 5:25 am End of run 110534. Start run 110535. 6:10 am Beam is back!! (was down for 20 minutes)

run 111206 is a 3 minute run, drop it!

run111290 is 20min run mostly cosmic, forget it! logbook says 09:20 No beam for last 15 minutes. Stop run 111290.

run 111430: 8 minute run forget it. logbook says: 11:22 Start the run 111430 11:30 MCC informed that they ran with same issue again while tuning up the beam so troubleshooting the issue continuously until it is resolved 11:30 Stop the run 111430, junked it,

Production checklist

  • Check RF monitoring plots - done (no FDC RF 110641-110796)
  • Check other monitoring histos - expert checks ongoing
  • Recalibrations - waiting for SC, then new launch, then CDC, BCAL
  • Geometry - waiting for sdmes
  • Final monitoring launch to check recalibrations