Difference between revisions of "OWG meeting 11-Apr-2008"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 43: Line 43:
 
'''Event Size Study''' - Alex S
 
'''Event Size Study''' - Alex S
  
* Dave L out of town for this meeting, everything needs to be compared to his original results
+
* see Alex's slides via link in agenda.
* studied rates and occupancies in all detectors
+
* Dave L out of town for this meeting, everything needs to be compared to his original results.
* included EM background (100 ns gate) from Geant3
+
* studied rates and occupancies in all detectors.
* included hadronic signal and background from Pythia (Eugene's version)
+
* included EM background (100 ns gate) from Geant3.
* used simple trigger cuts (e.g. FCAL E>0.300 GeV), will redo using strategy from CNU Genetic Algorithm study
+
* included hadronic signal and background from Pythia (Eugene's version).
* 400 kHz hadronic rate at 10**8 photons/sec, L1 divide by 2 to 200 kHz, L3 divide by 10 to 20 kHz
+
* used simple trigger cuts (e.g. FCAL E>0.4 GeV), will redo using strategy from CNU Genetic Algorithm study.
* EM supplies major background, more than hadronic
+
* 400 kHz hadronic rate at 10**8 photons/sec, L1 divide by 2 to 200 kHz, L3 divide by 10 to 20 kHz.
* advantage to tighten gates used in trigger to minimize EM background (Alex used 100 ns)
+
* EM supplies major background, more than hadronic.
* 10**8 tagged photons corresponds to about 3 10**8 in tagger, collimator removes about factor of 3
+
* advantage to tighten gates used in trigger to minimize EM background (Alex used 100 ns).
*
+
* 10**8 tagged photons corresponds to about 3 10**8 in tagger, collimator removes about factor of 3.
 +
* average number of hits in each detector in rough agreement with Dave L's results.
 +
* most hits in FDC, 475 per event, of which 269 is due to EM background.  Cuts are photon energy > 8 Gev, FCAL energy > 0.4 GeV
 +
* most detectors hit count dominated by EM.
 +
* some questions about photon cutoffs in simulation need to be resolved.
 +
* 100 ns may be too large a gate width.
 +
* optimization needed:  tighter gates may allow looser trigger, since events cleaned up
 +
* Alex will report again at the next meeting, will include summary tables, use CNU trigger algorithm, etc.
 +
* need to estimate bytes-per-hit for each detector to get final average event size.

Revision as of 12:19, 14 April 2008

Agenda


Time/Location

2pm Fri 11-Apr-2008 CC F326


Announcements

Subsystem review likely Wed,Thurs 7,8-May.


Elke's Deadlines

  • Final presentations to Elke: 5-May close-of-business
  • Pre-brief material to reviewers: 30-April
  • Pre-brief material to Hall-D group to read: 23-April
  • Pre-brief outlines: 11-April


Next Meeting

2pm Fri 18-Apr-2008 CC F326


New Action Items from this Meeting

Minutes

Attendees: Elliott W, Simon T, Elton S, Alex S, Fernando B, Mark I, Dave D, Chris C, Jim S, Eugene C.

Admin has approved two new sorely-needed hires for the JLab DAQ group. Both will focus on hardware. One will work with Dave A, the other will work with Ed J.


Event Size Study - Alex S

  • see Alex's slides via link in agenda.
  • Dave L out of town for this meeting, everything needs to be compared to his original results.
  • studied rates and occupancies in all detectors.
  • included EM background (100 ns gate) from Geant3.
  • included hadronic signal and background from Pythia (Eugene's version).
  • used simple trigger cuts (e.g. FCAL E>0.4 GeV), will redo using strategy from CNU Genetic Algorithm study.
  • 400 kHz hadronic rate at 10**8 photons/sec, L1 divide by 2 to 200 kHz, L3 divide by 10 to 20 kHz.
  • EM supplies major background, more than hadronic.
  • advantage to tighten gates used in trigger to minimize EM background (Alex used 100 ns).
  • 10**8 tagged photons corresponds to about 3 10**8 in tagger, collimator removes about factor of 3.
  • average number of hits in each detector in rough agreement with Dave L's results.
  • most hits in FDC, 475 per event, of which 269 is due to EM background. Cuts are photon energy > 8 Gev, FCAL energy > 0.4 GeV
  • most detectors hit count dominated by EM.
  • some questions about photon cutoffs in simulation need to be resolved.
  • 100 ns may be too large a gate width.
  • optimization needed: tighter gates may allow looser trigger, since events cleaned up
  • Alex will report again at the next meeting, will include summary tables, use CNU trigger algorithm, etc.
  • need to estimate bytes-per-hit for each detector to get final average event size.