Difference between revisions of "Minutes-9-22-2016"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replacement - "http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private" to "https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
#* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3421059 Reconstructed Momentum] (Paul)
 
#* [https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3421059 Reconstructed Momentum] (Paul)
 
#* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/3/31/Run11510_Ver01vs02.pdf FDC in Version01 vs Version02] (Alex)
 
#* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/3/31/Run11510_Ver01vs02.pdf FDC in Version01 vs Version02] (Alex)
#* [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=3110 MC studies of single pion and rho events] (Simon)
+
#* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=3110 MC studies of single pion and rho events] (Simon)
 
#* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/File:P2piCompare.pdf With and without FDC drift times] (Mike)
 
#* [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/File:P2piCompare.pdf With and without FDC drift times] (Mike)
 
# Preparation for the fall 2016 run
 
# Preparation for the fall 2016 run
Line 23: Line 23:
 
# fADC125 meeting (Naomi, Cody, Beni)
 
# fADC125 meeting (Naomi, Cody, Beni)
 
# Other
 
# Other
 
<!--
 
  
 
= Minutes =
 
= Minutes =
Line 38: Line 36:
 
- Paul plotted "measured-missing" pi momentum (log entry above) showing that there's 20% offset in the measurements at small (FDC) angles. => Something's wrong with analysis version 2.  
 
- Paul plotted "measured-missing" pi momentum (log entry above) showing that there's 20% offset in the measurements at small (FDC) angles. => Something's wrong with analysis version 2.  
  
- Simon presented extensive study (linked above) of the tracking resolution based on pull distributions with MC for different momenta ranging from
+
- Simon presented extensive study (linked above) of the tracking resolution based on pull distributions with MC for different momenta ranging from 0.25 to 4 GeV. He also used Paul's method for rho production and missing pi momentum to study the tracking resolution. Main observations:
 +
 
 +
-- poor tracking efficiency for theta < 40deg (0.25GeV) and <20deg (1-4 GeV), and at the same time some systematic deviations from the thrown momentum projections - not clear why (this is MC!). However no bias seen in the total momentum.
 +
 
 +
-- some modulations in the errors of the track parametrization parameters with phi, but the mean values are OK.
 +
 
 +
-- using MC doesn't see Paul's problems with real data.
 
   
 
   
 
== Other ==
 
== Other ==
  
 
- Next meeting in three weeks.
 
- Next meeting in three weeks.
 
 
-->
 

Latest revision as of 17:00, 24 February 2017

September 22, 2016 Drift Chamber meeting

Connection

  1. Instructions for Bluejeans meeting connection
  2. Meeting ID: 290664653

Headline text

  1. To join via a Web Browser, go to the page [1] https://bluejeans.com/290664653.

Agenda

  1. Collaboration meeting agenda
  2. Tracking
  3. Preparation for the fall 2016 run
    • CDC update (Naomi/Mike/Beni)
    • FDC update (Lubomir)
  4. fADC125 meeting (Naomi, Cody, Beni)
  5. Other

Minutes

Participants: Sean (NU), Curtis, Naomi, Mike (CMU) Eugene, Luke, Paul, Chris, Beni, Alexander A., Simon, Sergey, and Lubomir (JLab).

Collaboration meeting

- Simon will (have to) have a talk on the collaboration meeting in the tracking section, taking the Paul's slot.

Tracking

- Paul plotted "measured-missing" pi momentum (log entry above) showing that there's 20% offset in the measurements at small (FDC) angles. => Something's wrong with analysis version 2.

- Simon presented extensive study (linked above) of the tracking resolution based on pull distributions with MC for different momenta ranging from 0.25 to 4 GeV. He also used Paul's method for rho production and missing pi momentum to study the tracking resolution. Main observations:

-- poor tracking efficiency for theta < 40deg (0.25GeV) and <20deg (1-4 GeV), and at the same time some systematic deviations from the thrown momentum projections - not clear why (this is MC!). However no bias seen in the total momentum.

-- some modulations in the errors of the track parametrization parameters with phi, but the mean values are OK.

-- using MC doesn't see Paul's problems with real data.

Other

- Next meeting in three weeks.