Difference between revisions of "Minutes-4-5-2012"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
- Lubomir started working on a document describing the oxygen tests. The most important table with the measurements using the testing chamber is linked above. Important step from configuration #7 to #8: only the G10 groove was coated resulting in oxygen change from 1400 ppm to 280 ppm. To estimate the change factor we have to subtract the oxygen in the supply line. Beni measured it before using T-connector right at the chamber inlet: 200ppm. Lubomir measured it again by directly plugging the supply line into the sensor using the same tubing: 50ppm. The difference might be due to contamination from the chamber itself when using T-connector, or due to the higher pressure that is created when you plug directly the supply.
 
- Lubomir started working on a document describing the oxygen tests. The most important table with the measurements using the testing chamber is linked above. Important step from configuration #7 to #8: only the G10 groove was coated resulting in oxygen change from 1400 ppm to 280 ppm. To estimate the change factor we have to subtract the oxygen in the supply line. Beni measured it before using T-connector right at the chamber inlet: 200ppm. Lubomir measured it again by directly plugging the supply line into the sensor using the same tubing: 50ppm. The difference might be due to contamination from the chamber itself when using T-connector, or due to the higher pressure that is created when you plug directly the supply.
  
 +
- Eugene: what's the acceptable oxygen level; must be <0.05%, but in the prototype we had ~0.1% and was still operational. Assuming we will have ~300ppm per cell at 200cc/min then we will have 1800ppm for the whole package, but if operating at 400cc/min for the whole package it will be 900ppm or 0.09%. However, for this estimation we have to subtract the contribution from the oxygen in the supply gas. More realistic estimation can be done at Blue Crab with the real package.
 +
 +
- Results of the oxygen studies: contamination is an effect of a combination of the O-ring type and the surfaces around the O-ring. When g10 groove coated there was no difference which O-ring used, but with the plastic spacer EPDM showed higher oxygen. Viton and Buna-N showed no difference; Viton was chosen for the production due to reports of outgassing for Buna-N. We want to continue the studies to understand the mechanism of the oxygen permeation, but later when we have time.
 +
 +
- Oxygen sensor system was moved to Blue Crab and the four cells of the package #3 were tested at about the same flow of 200cc/min (measured with rotarmeter): ~7000ppm, which is in agreement with ~10000ppm for the whole package #1. Bill proposed and Beni agreed to move the new gas system (Brooks)
 +
to Blue Crab to better control the flow, while using the old MKS at JLab.
 
   
 
   
 
== Engineering ==
 
== Engineering ==
  
- We discussed if the Fluorinert will be a problem for our chambers. Lubomir talked to experts and did some study in the literature but no evidence found either for or against the use of Fluorinert. Tim: it's not a problem to use water. Beni asked if the pressure must be higher with water. Tim explained: it depends on the temperature tolerance and if acceptable we can always lower the pressure. Still the thick tube material will be there. Using air for cooling is probably not an option.
+
- Bill is finalizing the fiducial scheme
 
+
- Dave: we have received the parts for the hydrostatic tests of the cooling system.
+
  
 
== Electronics ==
 
== Electronics ==

Revision as of 15:16, 6 April 2012

April 5, 2012 FDC meeting

Agenda

  1. Production Construction Tracking (Dave)
    • New procedures for the O-ring replacements
    • Production status
  2. Results from the oxygen studies (Lubomir)
  3. Engineering update (Bill)
  4. Electronics update (Chris)
  5. Possibilities for cluster counting (Lubomir)
  6. Other