Difference between revisions of "Minutes-11-14-2013"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "November 14, 2013 FDC meeting = Agenda = # Installation status[http://www.jlab.org/Hall-D/detector/fdc/installation/FDC_installation.pdf] # Engineering (Bill) #* FDC survey #* C...")
 
m (Text replacement - "/halldweb1.jlab.org/" to "/halldweb.jlab.org/")
 
(13 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
#* Cooling system
 
#* Cooling system
 
# Electronics (Chris, Nick)
 
# Electronics (Chris, Nick)
# Mini-DAQ for FDC tests (Beni)
+
# Mini-DAQ for FDC tests [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/First_Tests_in_Hall-D] (Beni)
# Full electronics test analyses (Lubomir)  
+
# Full electronics test analyses [https://halldweb.jlab.org/elog-halld/FDC FDC E-log Entry 122] (Lubomir)  
 
# Other
 
# Other
 
<!--
 
  
 
= Minutes =
 
= Minutes =
  
Participants: Eugene, Fernando, Dave, Nick, Simon, Vlad, Beni, Bill(came later), and Lubomir.
+
Participants: Eugene, Bill, Dave, Nick, Chris, Simon, Vlad, Beni, and Lubomir.
  
 
== Installation ==
 
== Installation ==
  
- FDC has been moved on the platform and inserted in the magnet last Friday. Inside the magnet a survey of the downstream and upstream side has been done. Also FDC has been moved inside the magnet, and re-surveyed. Repeatability was very good (except for z-direction translation). Once the reflectors are installed the FDC will be moved again to the floor to survey the reflectors w.r.t. the already surveyed points. The work on the mesh has not started yet.
+
- FDC was moved to the floor on Monday. Bill, Casey, and Dave glued the 16 reflectors to the gussets of the packages (four per package). The survey group started working on the new targets yesterday and they are working now. Preliminary findings: if looking along z they found distance between the first and last package to the be the same as the measured one within 0.5mm (measured with measuring tape?). However, they found that this is no longer the case if you look at some angle (w.r.t. the normal of the reflectors), as Eugene expected. They are now trying to find what is the angle range that is acceptable. They were also instructed to redo all the surveys they did before: the four SMR holders on each package and the flatness measurements.  
+
- Bill received one reflector (made out of fused silica) and glued it to the holder. It has been tested then by the survey group: they found that it can be used at up to 6 m distance from the Fero unit with a resolution of 0.1 mm. The resolution was estimated from the repeatability of the measurements, keeping the positions the same. The new 16 reflectors (regular glass) have arrived and Bill will glue them to the holders. He will give one to the survey group for tests again, since the material is different. At the beginning of next week he will glue the holders to the gusset rings of the packages; there's a jig to fix their positions.
+
 
+
- The chilled water system must be ready now. According to Bill it will take just several hours to connect the chiller to the FDC and the chilled water, then we can test the FDC for leakage.
+
  
 
== Engineering ==
 
== Engineering ==
  
- Thickness of the packages: the thickness of a cell used so far in the simulation and data analyses was 2.1254 cm. By comparing the angles reconstructed from the Indiana chambers to those from the FDC, Lubomir estimated the thickness should be 2.15 +/- 0.1 cm (for the third package). This created some confusion that the nominal value may differ from the measured one due to the thickness of the glue on the cathodes that is not well controllable. However the problem was solved when Bill looked at the recent I-deas model and found the value there's 2.145 cm (after the meeting, xml file attached). He calculated also from the model the thickness of the full package: 14.42 cm and compared it to the results of the gusset flatness survey (attached) which gives 14.43 cmm for the first package: very good agreement! Bill is going to look at the other packages too.
+
- We discussed again the previous survey results. As stated at the last meeting, Bill found that the nominal thickness of the first package is very close to the measured value from the flatness data. However, when he looked at the other packages he found that 4 is OK, but 2 and 3 are not: ~0.5mm discrepancy. In addition there's a discrepancy for the position of the 4th package as measured with the four SMR holders between the Blue Crab and the first survey in the Hall. That's why they will redo all the measurements now.
 +
 
 +
- Bill: we have all the parts to connect the cooling system. Bill will check if the chilled water is ready, and what else remains to be done. We discussed if we want to do the cooling system checks down on the floor, or up on the platform. Most of the people preferred to do this on the platform (the disadvantage: more difficult to check the manifolds, tubing at the bottom). Tom had an idea to have a long tube that connects the FDC on the platform to the chiller through the magnet which will be the final connection, but Bill prefers to place the chiller at the upstream side with a short tube to the FDC as a temporary connection.
  
 
== Electronics ==
 
== Electronics ==
  
- The LV system will be installed at the north side; right now only the patch panels are there but Nick will install the power supplies as well. The HV system is already installed. After some discussions, the best will be to first install all the LV cables, route all of them to the top north cable tray and connect them permanently to the panels there. The cables that come from the south side should be lifted above the mesh and then directed to the north: we need open views to the reflectors.  
+
- Nick: all the cables have been nicely stored and organized in the cave behind the platform. The LV system is now connected. The two crates (fADC125 and F1TDC) that will be used for testing were mounted on the rack. The main issue now is the power for the crates. It turned out there's no 208V two phases on the transformer, that is the required power for the crates. In principle we can use 110V (but powering only some of the modules!), but it turned out there's only 15A and the crate requires 20A. Tom is looking now for a solution.
 +
 
 +
== Mini-DAQ ==
  
- At the beginning one VXS crate will be installed (even temporary) at the north side to be used in the mini-DAQ to test the cable connections during the first phase of the cabling. It will have at least one F1TDC and one fADC125. For the crate and the LV power supplies we may need 208V and therefore we will move the transformer there. We expect the racks to be powered in several weeks from now.  
+
- Beni has prepared a mini-DAQ system to test the cable connections while cabling. The system is now on "wilma" computer and has been tested there. See the link above for the full description of the system, as prepared by Beni. The system reads one module fADC125 and plots the pedestals; the widths will indicate proper connections. For the F1TDC the system sends pulses to the front of the pre-amp and gets back the timings. It's not a problem to install run the system from the new computer that will be on the platform "joebesser". As for the LV and HV system, Hovanes will be working on them; the systems are supposed to be ready but have not been tested with the real modules. In any case we can use Beni's LV system at the beginning to test the LV connections.
  
- Nick now has all the LV and signal cables, except for the spare signal cables for package 1.
+
== Full electronics test analyses ==
  
-->
+
- Lubomir estimated of the wire resolution (see Entry 122 in the Elog linked above) using external tracking (IU chambers). Previous attempt to do this with package #3 (partial electronics) failed. Lubomir and Beni fixed a bug in the IU chamber configuration and the position resolution was improved from ~6mm to ~2.7mm. We use two cells with parallel wires, #1 and #4, take the difference between the track angles reconstructed from IU chambers on a 154cm base and the two cells, then multiply it by the distance between the cells (6.45 cm). This is a measure of the resolution of the two cells. The first plot shows the resolution of one cell (~200 microns in 1-4 mm distance-to-the-wire region), but it has to be corrected by the IU chamber contribution estimated to be ~110 microns (with big uncertainty!).

Latest revision as of 06:05, 1 April 2015

November 14, 2013 FDC meeting

Agenda

  1. Installation status[1]
  2. Engineering (Bill)
    • FDC survey
    • Cooling system
  3. Electronics (Chris, Nick)
  4. Mini-DAQ for FDC tests [2] (Beni)
  5. Full electronics test analyses FDC E-log Entry 122 (Lubomir)
  6. Other

Minutes

Participants: Eugene, Bill, Dave, Nick, Chris, Simon, Vlad, Beni, and Lubomir.

Installation

- FDC was moved to the floor on Monday. Bill, Casey, and Dave glued the 16 reflectors to the gussets of the packages (four per package). The survey group started working on the new targets yesterday and they are working now. Preliminary findings: if looking along z they found distance between the first and last package to the be the same as the measured one within 0.5mm (measured with measuring tape?). However, they found that this is no longer the case if you look at some angle (w.r.t. the normal of the reflectors), as Eugene expected. They are now trying to find what is the angle range that is acceptable. They were also instructed to redo all the surveys they did before: the four SMR holders on each package and the flatness measurements.

Engineering

- We discussed again the previous survey results. As stated at the last meeting, Bill found that the nominal thickness of the first package is very close to the measured value from the flatness data. However, when he looked at the other packages he found that 4 is OK, but 2 and 3 are not: ~0.5mm discrepancy. In addition there's a discrepancy for the position of the 4th package as measured with the four SMR holders between the Blue Crab and the first survey in the Hall. That's why they will redo all the measurements now.

- Bill: we have all the parts to connect the cooling system. Bill will check if the chilled water is ready, and what else remains to be done. We discussed if we want to do the cooling system checks down on the floor, or up on the platform. Most of the people preferred to do this on the platform (the disadvantage: more difficult to check the manifolds, tubing at the bottom). Tom had an idea to have a long tube that connects the FDC on the platform to the chiller through the magnet which will be the final connection, but Bill prefers to place the chiller at the upstream side with a short tube to the FDC as a temporary connection.

Electronics

- Nick: all the cables have been nicely stored and organized in the cave behind the platform. The LV system is now connected. The two crates (fADC125 and F1TDC) that will be used for testing were mounted on the rack. The main issue now is the power for the crates. It turned out there's no 208V two phases on the transformer, that is the required power for the crates. In principle we can use 110V (but powering only some of the modules!), but it turned out there's only 15A and the crate requires 20A. Tom is looking now for a solution.

Mini-DAQ

- Beni has prepared a mini-DAQ system to test the cable connections while cabling. The system is now on "wilma" computer and has been tested there. See the link above for the full description of the system, as prepared by Beni. The system reads one module fADC125 and plots the pedestals; the widths will indicate proper connections. For the F1TDC the system sends pulses to the front of the pre-amp and gets back the timings. It's not a problem to install run the system from the new computer that will be on the platform "joebesser". As for the LV and HV system, Hovanes will be working on them; the systems are supposed to be ready but have not been tested with the real modules. In any case we can use Beni's LV system at the beginning to test the LV connections.

Full electronics test analyses

- Lubomir estimated of the wire resolution (see Entry 122 in the Elog linked above) using external tracking (IU chambers). Previous attempt to do this with package #3 (partial electronics) failed. Lubomir and Beni fixed a bug in the IU chamber configuration and the position resolution was improved from ~6mm to ~2.7mm. We use two cells with parallel wires, #1 and #4, take the difference between the track angles reconstructed from IU chambers on a 154cm base and the two cells, then multiply it by the distance between the cells (6.45 cm). This is a measure of the resolution of the two cells. The first plot shows the resolution of one cell (~200 microns in 1-4 mm distance-to-the-wire region), but it has to be corrected by the IU chamber contribution estimated to be ~110 microns (with big uncertainty!).