Difference between revisions of "Mattione Update 09212011"
From GlueXWiki
(→TOF Deposited Energy Uncertainty) |
(→π<sup>-</sup> hits in both TOF planes) |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
* Most probable deposited energy calculated via Equation 27.10 in Section 27.2.7 of the [http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-passage-particles-matter.pdf RPP]. | * Most probable deposited energy calculated via Equation 27.10 in Section 27.2.7 of the [http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-passage-particles-matter.pdf RPP]. | ||
− | * Perhaps the best way to do it is to look at the dE distribution as a function of track momentum, and get the uncertainty from the width of that distribution. | + | * Perhaps the best way to do it is to look at the dE distribution as a function of track momentum, and get the uncertainty from the width of that distribution. How would the energy uncertainty be calibrated using real data? |
== TOF X Uncertainty == | == TOF X Uncertainty == |
Revision as of 13:02, 21 September 2011
Contents
Summary
- OBJECTIVE: I'm updating the reconstruction uncertainties to improve the particle-ID algorithms and support the kinematic fitting analyses.
- PLAN: I'm comparing the generated and reconstructed track parameters in the TOF, BCAL, and FCAL systems to determine the uncertainties.
- STATUS: TOF Uncertainties are below.
TOF Time Uncertainty
π- hits in both TOF planes
- Δt vs. x, y, average dE
- Fit the Δt distributions to Gaussian functions, σt's are fit below.
π- hit only in the horizontal plane
- Δt vs. x, y, dE
- Fit the Δt distributions to Gaussian functions, σt's are fit below.
π- hit only in the vertical plane
- Δt vs. x, y, dE
- Fit the Δt distributions to Gaussian functions, σt's are fit below.
TOF Deposited Energy Uncertainty
π- hits in both TOF planes
- ΔdE (Measured Average - Most Probable) vs. Most Probable (NOT True) dE
- ΔdE (Measured Average - Most Probable) vs. Measured Average dE
- Most probable deposited energy calculated via Equation 27.10 in Section 27.2.7 of the RPP.
- Perhaps the best way to do it is to look at the dE distribution as a function of track momentum, and get the uncertainty from the width of that distribution. How would the energy uncertainty be calibrated using real data?
TOF X Uncertainty
π- hits in both TOF planes
- Δx vs. x
- Fit the Δx distributions to Gaussian functions, means are shown below.