Difference between revisions of "Mattione Update 09212011"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(TOF Deposited Energy Uncertainty)
(TOF Deposited Energy Uncertainty)
Line 43: Line 43:
 
<br style="clear:both;"/>
 
<br style="clear:both;"/>
  
=== TOF Deposited Energy Uncertainty ===
+
== TOF Deposited Energy Uncertainty ==
  
* &Delta;dE (Average - Most Probable) vs. Average dE
+
* &Delta;dE (Measured Average - Most Probable) vs. Measured Average dE
[[Image:Mattione_Update_09212011_TOF_DeltadEVsAvgdE.gif|thumb|left|500px|&Delta;dE vs. avg. dE]]
+
[[Image:Mattione_Update_09212011_TOF_DeltadEVsProbabledE.gif|thumb|left|500px|&Delta;dE vs. Most Probable dE]]
[[Image:Mattione_Update_09212011_TOF_DeltadEVsProbabledE.gif|thumb|left|500px|&Delta;dE vs. Probable dE]]
+
[[Image:Mattione_Update_09212011_TOF_DeltadEVsAvgdE.gif|thumb|left|500px|&Delta;dE vs. Measured Avg. dE]]
 
<br style="clear:both;"/>
 
<br style="clear:both;"/>

Revision as of 10:55, 21 September 2011

Summary

  • OBJECTIVE: I'm updating the reconstruction uncertainties to improve the particle-ID algorithms and support the kinematic fitting analyses.
  • PLAN: I'm comparing the generated and reconstructed track parameters in the TOF, BCAL, and FCAL systems to determine the uncertainties.
  • STATUS: TOF Uncertainties are below.

TOF Time Uncertainty

π- hits in both TOF planes

  • Δt vs. x, y, average dE
Δt vs. x
Δt vs. y
Δt vs. avg. dE


  • Fit the Δt distributions to Gaussian functions, σt's are fit below.
σt vs. x
σt vs. y
σt vs. avg. dE


π- hit only in the horizontal plane

  • Δt vs. x, y, dE
Δt vs. x
Δt vs. dE


  • Fit the Δt distributions to Gaussian functions, σt's are fit below.
σt vs. x
σt vs. dE


π- hit only in the vertical plane

  • Δt vs. x, y, dE
Δt vs. y
Δt vs. dE


  • Fit the Δt distributions to Gaussian functions, σt's are fit below.
σt vs. y
σt vs. dE


TOF Deposited Energy Uncertainty

  • ΔdE (Measured Average - Most Probable) vs. Measured Average dE
ΔdE vs. Most Probable dE
ΔdE vs. Measured Avg. dE