Difference between revisions of "Mattione Update 02112013"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* I have created a factory for skimming data into different output REST files. It will be available soon. | * I have created a factory for skimming data into different output REST files. It will be available soon. | ||
* Below are some statistics on the data challenge data for various potential topologies/skims. | * Below are some statistics on the data challenge data for various potential topologies/skims. | ||
| − | * Data challenge data-set size: ~ | + | * Data challenge data-set size: ~5 billion events, 50k events per file: ~100k files, ~100 MB per file: 10 TB total. |
== 2+ 1- == | == 2+ 1- == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! >= 2+, >= 1- | ! >= 2+, >= 1- | ||
| − | | 71.68% || ~ | + | | 71.68% || ~7.2 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 2n | ! >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 2n | ||
| − | | 62.32% || ~ | + | | 62.32% || ~6.2 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ! >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ||
| − | | 58.36% || ~ | + | | 58.36% || ~5.8 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1- | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1- | ||
| − | | 56.56% || ~ | + | | 56.56% || ~5.7 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 2n | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 2n | ||
| − | | 47.21% || ~ | + | | 47.21% || ~4.7 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ||
| − | | 45.33% || ~ | + | | 45.33% || ~4.5 TB |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! >= 2+, >= 2- | ! >= 2+, >= 2- | ||
| − | | 37.95% || ~ | + | | 37.95% || ~3.8 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ! >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ||
| − | | 34.07% || ~ | + | | 34.07% || ~3.4 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ! >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ||
| − | | 31.52% || ~ | + | | 31.52% || ~3.2 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2- | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2- | ||
| − | | 23.02% || ~ | + | | 23.02% || ~2.3 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ||
| − | | 20.34% || ~2. | + | | 20.34% || ~2.0 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ||
| − | | 18.70% || ~ | + | | 18.70% || ~1.9 TB |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! >= 3+, >= 2- | ! >= 3+, >= 2- | ||
| − | | 24.15% || ~ | + | | 24.15% || ~2.4 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ! >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ||
| − | | 21.57% || ~2. | + | | 21.57% || ~2.2 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ! >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ||
| − | | 19.88% || ~2. | + | | 19.88% || ~2.0 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2- | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2- | ||
| − | | 11.31% || ~1. | + | | 11.31% || ~1.1 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 2n | ||
| − | | 9.90% || ~1. | + | | 9.90% || ~1.0 TB |
|- | |- | ||
! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ! Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 1 π<sup>0</sup> | ||
| − | | 9.05% || ~ | + | | 9.05% || ~0.9 TB |
|} | |} | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 11 February 2013
Skimming REST Data Challenge Data
- I have created a factory for skimming data into different output REST files. It will be available soon.
- Below are some statistics on the data challenge data for various potential topologies/skims.
- Data challenge data-set size: ~5 billion events, 50k events per file: ~100k files, ~100 MB per file: 10 TB total.
2+ 1-
- Note: For a charged particle to be valid, it must have 45.0 < Vertex-Z < 85.0.
- Note: π0 means: 0.1 < γγ Invariant Mass < 0.17 (Loose Cut).
| Skim Type | % of File Size Remaining | Projected Total Skim Size |
|---|---|---|
| >= 2+, >= 1- | 71.68% | ~7.2 TB |
| >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 2n | 62.32% | ~6.2 TB |
| >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 1 π0 | 58.36% | ~5.8 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1- | 56.56% | ~5.7 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 2n | 47.21% | ~4.7 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 1-, >= 1 π0 | 45.33% | ~4.5 TB |
2+ 2-
- Note: For a charged particle to be valid, it must have 45.0 < Vertex-Z < 85.0.
- Note: π0 means: 0.1 < γγ Invariant Mass < 0.17 (Loose Cut).
| Skim Type | % of File Size Remaining | Projected Total Skim Size |
|---|---|---|
| >= 2+, >= 2- | 37.95% | ~3.8 TB |
| >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 2n | 34.07% | ~3.4 TB |
| >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 1 π0 | 31.52% | ~3.2 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2- | 23.02% | ~2.3 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 2n | 20.34% | ~2.0 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 2+, >= 2-, >= 1 π0 | 18.70% | ~1.9 TB |
3+ 2-
- Note: For a charged particle to be valid, it must have 45.0 < Vertex-Z < 85.0.
- Note: π0 means: 0.1 < γγ Invariant Mass < 0.17 (Loose Cut).
| Skim Type | % of File Size Remaining | Projected Total Skim Size |
|---|---|---|
| >= 3+, >= 2- | 24.15% | ~2.4 TB |
| >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 2n | 21.57% | ~2.2 TB |
| >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 1 π0 | 19.88% | ~2.0 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2- | 11.31% | ~1.1 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 2n | 9.90% | ~1.0 TB |
| Tracking FOM > 0.1%, >= 3+, >= 2-, >= 1 π0 | 9.05% | ~0.9 TB |
