Difference between revisions of "KL Proposal"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* [[KL Proposal Meeting, December 5, 2016|December 5, 2016]] | * [[KL Proposal Meeting, December 5, 2016|December 5, 2016]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | The tentative agenda is | ||
+ | 1) Our schedule (back in time): | ||
+ | - We may expect that PAC will be scheduled for July. | ||
+ | - We have to submit our proposal 6 weeks in advance (May-June) | ||
+ | - It will probably take 4 weeks for the GlueX Collaboration to review (April-May) | ||
+ | - In March, we plan to ask Rolf for a technical review (upon the Jim Napolitano's suggestion) | ||
+ | - GlueX Collab meeting is scheduled for Feb 16-18 and we have to talk about KL. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2) We have to make a conceptual design of the KL project which allows to estimate a | ||
+ | cost of the KL. To do that we have to draw a Note and then ask Eugene to ask Tim to make it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3) Status of MC simulations of expected data. | ||
+ | ds/dO for KLp-->K+n (Mikhail) | ||
+ | ds/dO and Sigma for KLp-->K+Xi (Nick) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4) Status of neutron background simulations (Igor) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5) etc |
Revision as of 03:46, 22 November 2016
Meetings
The tentative agenda is 1) Our schedule (back in time): - We may expect that PAC will be scheduled for July. - We have to submit our proposal 6 weeks in advance (May-June) - It will probably take 4 weeks for the GlueX Collaboration to review (April-May) - In March, we plan to ask Rolf for a technical review (upon the Jim Napolitano's suggestion) - GlueX Collab meeting is scheduled for Feb 16-18 and we have to talk about KL.
2) We have to make a conceptual design of the KL project which allows to estimate a cost of the KL. To do that we have to draw a Note and then ask Eugene to ask Tim to make it.
3) Status of MC simulations of expected data. ds/dO for KLp-->K+n (Mikhail) ds/dO and Sigma for KLp-->K+Xi (Nick)
4) Status of neutron background simulations (Igor)
5) etc