Difference between revisions of "CPP and NPP Run Conditions"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
* Electron beam energy expected = 11.7 GeV based on the planned [https://www.jlab.org/sites/default/files/user-liaison/documents/Web20211122.1.pdf Experimental Schedule]
 
* Electron beam energy expected = 11.7 GeV based on the planned [https://www.jlab.org/sites/default/files/user-liaison/documents/Web20211122.1.pdf Experimental Schedule]
 
* Microscope will cover the range of [0.301-0.514] of the beam energy or [4.57-6.01 GeV]
 
* Microscope will cover the range of [0.301-0.514] of the beam energy or [4.57-6.01 GeV]
* Pair Spectrometer magnet will be scaled down by 6/9 = 0.67 of its nominal field (??)
+
* Pair Spectrometer magnet will be scaled down by 6/9 = 0.67 of its nominal field (569.4 A = 0.67x849.9 A)
  
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"

Revision as of 08:23, 13 April 2022

  • CPP and NPP Run Conditions
  • Electron beam energy expected = 11.7 GeV based on the planned Experimental Schedule
  • Microscope will cover the range of [0.301-0.514] of the beam energy or [4.57-6.01 GeV]
  • Pair Spectrometer magnet will be scaled down by 6/9 = 0.67 of its nominal field (569.4 A = 0.67x849.9 A)
Time estimates for Run Plan
Activity Duration (PAC Days) Current Target Collimator Radiator Comment
Full target (Production) 20 27 nA Pb (0.3 mm) 3.4 mm JD70-103 or JD70-107 Alternate 0/90 deg diamond configuration
Empty Target 1.5? 27 nA - 3.4 mm JD70-103 or JD70-107 Run at higher current?
Diamond Alignment 0.5? 20 nA? Pb (0.3 mm) 3.4 mm JD70-103 and JD70-107
Trigger Commissioning 1.3? 100 nA? Pb (0.3 mm) 3.4 mm JD70-103 or JD70-107
Lead Shield Alignment 0.1? 100 nA? Pb (0.3 mm) 3.4 mm JD70-103 or JD70-107
Beam Energy Calibration 0.1? 100 nA Pb (0.3 mm) 3.4 mm JD70-103 or JD70-107 Collimator Blocking for 5 min, periodically
TAC Runs 1.5? <2 nA - 3.4 mm AMO (2x10-5)