|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | In November, we had a one week beamtime at CHESS in Cornell University. We measured rocking curves for several diamond crystals there. Some interesting results are shown as follow. | + | In November, we had a one week beamtime at CHESS in Cornell University. We measured rocking curves for several diamond crystals there. Some interesting results are shown below. |
| | | | |
| − | '''1. results for the 20 micron diamond.'''
| + | * [[Results for the 20 micron diamond]] |
| − | | + | * [[Discussion about the x ray beam divergence]] |
| − | A contour map of rocking curve width for the 20 micron thick diamond crystal (diffraction plane: (-2 2 0)):
| + | * [[How the crystal curvature affects the rocking curve width]] |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:Rockingwidth414.jpg]]. | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | A rocking curve width map for the 20 micron crystal (Diffraction plane :( 2 2 0)):
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:Rocking_width405n.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Rocking curves measured by isolated pixels of the CCD camera at some interesting locations.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:rocking curve01.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:rocking curve02.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:rocking curve03.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:rocking curve04.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The minimum rocking curve width for the 20 micron diamond is around 30 \micron r. The measured rocking curve width is broader than the true rocking curve with of the diamond crystal due to the instrumental broadening. The main source of the instrumental broadening is the x ray beam divergence. For an isolated pixel, the beam divergence is ~ 15 micro radians. We used a (+,-) crystal set-up for the monochromator crystal and the diamond crystal. Since the diffraction angles are different, this setting is not truly non dispersive. The additional rocking curve width from dispersion is ~ 9 micro radians. Taking the above 2 contributions into account, the diamond rocking curve width should be less than ~24 micro radians. Another possible reason for the rocking curve broadening is the curvature of the diamond crystal. The adhesives used for mounting and the marks on the crystal surfaces are the possible sources that could introduce stress to the crystal and the crystal are deformed by stress. If the crystal diffraction plane is all the same at different crystal locations, the measured rocking curve should have the same rocking curve peak position (if the d spacing is all the same for different positions). The rocking curve peak positions recorded by different pixels of the camera are quiet different, this means the 20 micron diamond crystal is severally deformed by stress.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The following are 2 graphs showing the rocking curve peak positions varying with pixel positions.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:peak001.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:peak002.jpg]]. | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | If we assume the rocking curve peak position shift is caused only by the curved Bragg plane. We can use the peak shifts to reconstruct the crystal shape. In order to reconstruct the diamond crystal shape, we need at least two rocking curve scan. Then we have a question- How to locate the same point on the sample from the images taken at different settings? The first reason for this is the image taken at different setting has a different Chi angle, which means the image has been rotated by a certain angle. Secondly, due to the CCD camera is perpendicular to the diffracted x-ray beam, the image height is smaller than the crystal height, so we need to rescale the image in vertical direction. The alignment error could be another reason for the need of a translating and rotating transformation. In order to do this transformation, we need at least 2 characteristic points to determine the parameters we need. Probably we also need a third one to check the results. The characteristic points should be taken at easily distinguishable points, such as corners.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The following is a graph showing the reconstructed diamond crystal by using the peak shift information. It shows only part of the 20 micron diamond crystal. Because the vertical x ray beam size is smaller than the crystal size, we do not have enough information to reconstruct the whole crystal.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:shape2414.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''2. Discussion about the x ray beam divergence'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Comparison of the rocking curve width after and before using the 220 silicon monochromator.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:comparisonv2.jpg]]. | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''3. How the crystal curvature affects the rocking curve width'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:curvatureeff1.jpg]].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Image:curvatureeff2.jpg]].
| + | |
In November, we had a one week beamtime at CHESS in Cornell University. We measured rocking curves for several diamond crystals there. Some interesting results are shown below.
