Difference between revisions of "CHESS X-ray measurements 11/2006"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* [[How the crystal curvature affects the rocking curve width]] | * [[How the crystal curvature affects the rocking curve width]] | ||
| − | One of the challenges we faced during the feasibility measurements at CHESS in | + | One of the challenges we faced during the 2006 feasibility measurements at CHESS was how to sufficiently collimate the beam to resolve the rocking curve structure of diamond on the scale of its natural Darwin width. Using the C1 beam line Si(111) monochromator, the narrowest rocking curves we could obtain were of order 150 μr fwhm. This width was understood as coming from dispersion, due to the large energy width of the monochromated beam. The advantages of this setup were that the beam intensity was higher than we needed and the beam size filled the 15mm x 15mm beam line aperture. With such a large beam it was possible to expose the entire diamond in a single scan. |
| + | |||
| + | As a means to narrow the energy distribution of the beam, a second monochromator was installed between the C1 monochromator and the diamond. It was a symmetric channel-cut silicon (220) cyrstal. We rotated the crystal about the (220) axis by a few degrees to get rid of the (224) and higher reflections. | ||
Revision as of 09:11, 10 March 2007
In November, we had a one week beam time at CHESS in Cornell University. We measured rocking curves for several diamond crystals there. Some interesting results are shown below.
- Results for the 20 micron diamond
- Discussion about the X-ray beam divergence
- How the crystal curvature affects the rocking curve width
One of the challenges we faced during the 2006 feasibility measurements at CHESS was how to sufficiently collimate the beam to resolve the rocking curve structure of diamond on the scale of its natural Darwin width. Using the C1 beam line Si(111) monochromator, the narrowest rocking curves we could obtain were of order 150 μr fwhm. This width was understood as coming from dispersion, due to the large energy width of the monochromated beam. The advantages of this setup were that the beam intensity was higher than we needed and the beam size filled the 15mm x 15mm beam line aperture. With such a large beam it was possible to expose the entire diamond in a single scan.
As a means to narrow the energy distribution of the beam, a second monochromator was installed between the C1 monochromator and the diamond. It was a symmetric channel-cut silicon (220) cyrstal. We rotated the crystal about the (220) axis by a few degrees to get rid of the (224) and higher reflections.
