Difference between revisions of "CDC old & new preamp noise scope trace study"
From GlueXWiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Naomi's preAmp : the new preAmp. | * Naomi's preAmp : the new preAmp. | ||
| − | <b> Left is always Yves' old preAmp, middle is Beni's old preAmp, right is Naomi's new preAmp </b> | + | <b> Left is always Yves' old preAmp, middle is Beni's old preAmp, right is Naomi's new preAmp </b> |
| + | [except mentioned differently] | ||
First 2000V was put on the chamber and a random cosmic ray signal was selected: | First 2000V was put on the chamber and a random cosmic ray signal was selected: | ||
Revision as of 15:20, 30 June 2010
A study was performed using three preAmps:
- Yves' old preAmp : the old preamp that changed behavior a month ago
- Beni's old preAmp: the old preamp used before by Beni.
- Naomi's preAmp : the new preAmp.
Left is always Yves' old preAmp, middle is Beni's old preAmp, right is Naomi's new preAmp [except mentioned differently]
First 2000V was put on the chamber and a random cosmic ray signal was selected:
OK, so far so good. Let's switch the HV off and look at the ringing: the highest amplitude ringing was selected,
so you are looking at the high end of the pedestal:
Channel 1
Channel 8
Channel 9
Channel 15 <- This channel is always used for Fe-55 measurements
The old preAmp has higher amplitude noise in chip2 -> channels 9-16 The new preamp has lower amplitude ringing compared to the old preAmp.
Now it comes: remember the wierd noise peaks:
