Difference between revisions of "August 31, 2023"
From GlueXWiki
(→Meeting minutes) |
(→Meeting minutes) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*Sasha joined the meeting and mentioned he would look into this with some examples provided. | *Sasha joined the meeting and mentioned he would look into this with some examples provided. | ||
*Bo also showed the efficiency plot of the piminus proton channel. He also saw a hard cut on both particles hitting the BCAL. But this seems to be a geometrical feature different from Jackson's case | *Bo also showed the efficiency plot of the piminus proton channel. He also saw a hard cut on both particles hitting the BCAL. But this seems to be a geometrical feature different from Jackson's case | ||
| + | *Bo asked about the plan to mass produce the simulation. Tim and Jackson suggested to wait until the trigger simulation is more stable. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:47, 31 August 2023
Connection details
- Meeting time: Thursdays 3:30pm
- Zoom link: https://gwu-edu.zoom.us/j/92338509872?pwd=QUltQnJIWlFBRm5MQnp6TnRML3M4UT09
- Meeting ID: 923 3850 9872 Passcode: 440162
- Link to all previous meetings: Hall D SRC/CT Weekly Technical Meetings
Meeting minutes
- Jackson discussed about the a forward proton peak observed in j/psi simulation with the implementation of the trigger. It seems like the events with two particles hitting BCAL are rejected by the trigger pretty much. This may indicate a not properly modelled energy deposition in the simulation.
- Sasha joined the meeting and mentioned he would look into this with some examples provided.
- Bo also showed the efficiency plot of the piminus proton channel. He also saw a hard cut on both particles hitting the BCAL. But this seems to be a geometrical feature different from Jackson's case
- Bo asked about the plan to mass produce the simulation. Tim and Jackson suggested to wait until the trigger simulation is more stable.
