Difference between revisions of "Alternative readout"
From GlueXWiki
(→Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies == | == Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies == | ||
− | * [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=832 Readout of the barrel calorimeter based on conventional photomultiplier tubes] (GlueX-doc-832) | + | * [http://argus.phys.uregina.ca/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=832 Readout of the barrel calorimeter based on conventional photomultiplier tubes] (GlueX-doc-832, Jun 2007) |
− | * | + | * Comments: |
+ | ** Area of fibers cover 50% of the area of the end of the Bcal. Reduction is 2. | ||
+ | ** Area of the output of the WC (1.2 cm2) reduces the readout by 4cm2/1.2cm2 = 3.3. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The Sketch below is to illustrate the space constraints for any light collection and readout system: | ||
+ | [[Image:Bcal_guides.gif]] <br> |
Revision as of 08:26, 9 June 2008
Options for readout of the Bcal using existing technologies
- Readout of the barrel calorimeter based on conventional photomultiplier tubes (GlueX-doc-832, Jun 2007)
- Comments:
- Area of fibers cover 50% of the area of the end of the Bcal. Reduction is 2.
- Area of the output of the WC (1.2 cm2) reduces the readout by 4cm2/1.2cm2 = 3.3.
- The Sketch below is to illustrate the space constraints for any light collection and readout system: