Difference between revisions of "2017-01 recon ver02 plans"
From GlueXWiki
(→Checklist) |
(→Checklist) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* <strike>Updates to track projection</strike> (Simon) - NOT INCLUDED | * <strike>Updates to track projection</strike> (Simon) - NOT INCLUDED | ||
* <strike>BCAL - charged track reconstruction issues?</strike>- Simon - ROLLED BACK TO OLD MATERIAL MAPS | * <strike>BCAL - charged track reconstruction issues?</strike>- Simon - ROLLED BACK TO OLD MATERIAL MAPS | ||
− | * TAGM - Updates to timing - Alex B./Sean | + | * <strike>TAGM - Updates to timing</strike> - Alex B./Sean - DONE |
=== Plans === | === Plans === |
Revision as of 12:41, 3 November 2017
Checklist
- New TOF ADC/TDC hit matching (Beni) - check monitoring results
- FCAL
- Add shower classifier (Matt/Sean) - maybe not at this point
-
Geometry(Sean coordinates) - DONE - Update calibrations - three periods: high-rate 2017, low-rate 2017, 2016
- Gains
- Shower energy non-linearities
- Timing:
-
sim-recon- DONE - shower time walks - DONE for high-rate 2017
- block time offsets
-
-
Update Start Counter Resolutions(Mahmoud/Sean) - DONE -
Updates to track projection(Simon) - NOT INCLUDED -
BCAL - charged track reconstruction issues?- Simon - ROLLED BACK TO OLD MATERIAL MAPS -
TAGM - Updates to timing- Alex B./Sean - DONE
Plans
These improvements are expected to go into the next round of reconstructed data:
- improved CDC dE/dx calculation
- use of ADC amplitude instead of integral - dE/dx vs theta
- updated truncation value
- improved TOF calibrations
- use of ADC amplitude instead of integral
-
new SC attenuation length corrections - BCAL charged track clusterizer
- FCAL updates
- Updated gains (fix problems with inner rings)
- Updated timing (fix high-rate running problem)
- Update geometry?
- updated charged/neutral error matrices?
Outstanding questions:
- What is the bump in BCAL & FCAL monitoring delta T distributions at +4 ns?
- What is the bump in SC monitoring delta T distributions at ~ -8 ns?
- What is the inefficiency in the TOF matching efficiency near the beam hole due to?
- What is going on with the BCAL positions measurements?