Difference between revisions of "Mapping PS results"
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
'''2.0T data''' | '''2.0T data''' | ||
− | [[ | + | [[Ps_2d_p4_2T.pdf]] gradients on the z-component of the field,Bz, for 2.0T. Top left: 2D map, top right: color plot of Bz (in Tesla) in function of x and z (cm). Bottom left plot: Bz gradient along x normalized to By. Bottom right plot: Bz gradient along z normalized to By. |
Revision as of 17:50, 7 April 2014
Data
2D maps
2D (z,x) maps were taken at nominal field (1.8T) for 3 vertical (y) positions (0, +/1 cm), and at 2.0Y for y=0):
1.8T, y=0 2D results: Media: Ps_2d_y0_1.8T.pdf Hall probes 1 (red), 3 (blue) and 5 (magenta) measured By. Probe 2 (green) measured Bx, probe 4 (light blue) measured Bz.
1.8T, y=+1cm 2D results: Media: Ps_2d_yp1_1.8T.pdf. All Hall probes measured By.
1.8T, y=-1cm 2D results:Media: Ps_2d_ym1_1.8T.pdf. All Hall probes measured By.
2.0T, y=0 2D results: Media: Ps_2d_y0_2.0T.pdf Hall probes 1 (red), 2 (green), and 3 (blue) measured By. Probe and 5 (magenta) measured Bx, probe 4 (light blue) measured Bz.
1D maps
1D maps, along z, were taken at 3 field values: 2.0T, 1.5T and 1.0T for 3 transverse (x) positions, at at x=0 only for 1.8T.
2.0, x=0 result (Hall probes measured By): Media: Ps_1dz_2.0T.pdf
2.0, x=-10cm result (Hall probes measured By):Media:Ps_1dz_xp10_2.0T.pdf
2.0, x=+10cm result (Hall probes measured By):Media:Ps_1dz_xm10_2.0T.pdf
1.8T, x=0 result (Hall probes measured By): Media: Ps_1dz_1.8T.pdf
1.5, x=0 result (Hall probes measured By): Media: Ps_1dz_1.5T.pdf
1.5, x=-10cm result (Hall probes measured By): Media:Ps_1dz_xp5_1.5T.pdf
1.5, x=+5cm result (Hall probes measured By):Media:Ps_1dz_xm10_1.5T.pdf
1.0, x=0 result (Hall probes measured By): Media: Ps_1dz_1.0T.pdf
1.0, x=-10cm result (Hall probes measured By): Media: Ps_1dz_xp5_1.0T.pdf
1.0, x=+5cm result (Hall probes measured By): Media: Ps_1dz_xm10_1.0T.pdf
Inclination study
For the 1.8T y=0 and the 2.0T 2D maps, two Hall probes were set to measure the Bx and Bz component of the field in order to verify at what level the x and z translations of the probes during the mapping were flat. We show here the results of these measurements.
2.0T data
Ps_2d_p4_2T.pdf gradients on the z-component of the field,Bz, for 2.0T. Top left: 2D map, top right: color plot of Bz (in Tesla) in function of x and z (cm). Bottom left plot: Bz gradient along x normalized to By. Bottom right plot: Bz gradient along z normalized to By.
Gradient study
We looked at gradients dB/B, mostly to determine where an NMR monitoring probe could be installed. (These probes do not tolerate gradient greater than 200 to 600 ppm.)
2.0T data
Media:Grad_2.0T.pdf gradients on the y-component of the field,By, for 2.0T. Top left: 2D map (By in blue/red/green, Bz in light blue and Bx in magenta), top right: color plot of By (in mTesla) in function of x and z (cm). Bottom left plot: By gradient along x normalized to By (in 0/00). Bottom right plot: By gradient along z normalized to By (in 0/00).
1.8T data
Media:Grad_1.8T.pdf gradients on the y-component of the field,By, for 1.8T. Top left: 2D map (By in purple/red/blue, Bz in light blue and Bx in green), top right: color plot of By (in mTesla) in function of x and z (cm). Bottom left plot: By gradient along x normalized to By (in 0/00). Bottom right plot: By gradient along z normalized to By (in 0/00).
Media:Grad_1.8T_zoom1.pdf Same as above but zoomed with -10cm<z<+45cm.
Media:Grad_1.8T_zoom2.pdf Same as above but zoomed with -10cm<z<+20cm and normalized gradients are in ppm.