Difference between revisions of "Oct 7, 2009 Readout"
From GlueXWiki
(→Documents to Review) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
= Documents to Review= | = Documents to Review= | ||
| + | |||
| + | # [[Media:Draw trigs 38deg.pdf]] [[Media:Draw trigs 73deg.pdf]] for segment #2. | ||
| + | #* Entrance rectangle is 3.01x4.0 cm. Exit radius is 1.35 cm. Length of trapezoid/cone is 60 cm, and length of torus is also 60 cm. | ||
| + | #* This configuration should be comparable to Alam's "cylindrical cone" geometry. | ||
| + | # See also [[Media:Effective diameter NIMA368(1996)628.png |Effective diameter vs B field and angle]] from Antonelli et al., NIMA 368 (1996) 628-634. | ||
= Tentative Agenda = | = Tentative Agenda = | ||
Revision as of 08:02, 7 October 2009
Teleconference Time: 12:15 p.m. EST
- ESNET and EVO session
- Phone:
- +1-800-377-8846 : US
- +1-888-276-7715 : Canada
- +1-302-709-8424 : International
- then enter participant code: 77438230# (remember the "#"). Phone connection only upon request.
Contents
Items for followup from previous meeting
- Ship Baby Bcal to USM.
- Make progress on USM MOU document (Elton, Will, Eugene)
- Optimization of Bfield direction and magnitude relative to pmt
- Light collection efficiencies for light guides for "USM" geometry.
Documents to Review
- Media:Draw trigs 38deg.pdf Media:Draw trigs 73deg.pdf for segment #2.
- Entrance rectangle is 3.01x4.0 cm. Exit radius is 1.35 cm. Length of trapezoid/cone is 60 cm, and length of torus is also 60 cm.
- This configuration should be comparable to Alam's "cylindrical cone" geometry.
- See also Effective diameter vs B field and angle from Antonelli et al., NIMA 368 (1996) 628-634.
Tentative Agenda
- Announcements
- Review of Action Items
- Plan for SiPM Testing (Carl and Fernando)
- USM report
- Light Guide Geometry
- Light Guide Simulations
- Discussions on MOU with USM
