Difference between revisions of "Sep 23, 2010 Readout"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Items for followup from previous meeting)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
=Items for followup from previous meeting=
 
=Items for followup from previous meeting=
  
# Testing goals and setup (Serguei)  
+
# Collect this information of testing (including goals and setup) on the wiki for ease of presenting information. (USM)
# Will to find out if there is any feedback from USM on terms and conditions from our procurement package.
+
# <strike> Will to update statement of work for USM contract and develop detailed schedule. </strike> Draft in progress.
# Will to update statement of work for USM contract and develop detailed schedule.
+
# Collect this information of testing on the wiki for ease of presenting information. (USM)
+
  
 
= Documents to Review=
 
= Documents to Review=
Line 23: Line 21:
 
# Review of Action Items
 
# Review of Action Items
 
# Update - USM
 
# Update - USM
#* SiPM test stand (Alam)
 
#* Status of statement of work (SOW)
 
 
# [[SiPM Radiation Hardness Test]]  (Update from Yi)
 
# [[SiPM Radiation Hardness Test]]  (Update from Yi)
 
# Electronics/cooling
 
# Electronics/cooling
# Geometry
+
# Geometry and light guides
 
# Simulation runs
 
# Simulation runs
# Cosmic-ray setup at UofR
 
# Light guides
 
# [[GlueX-Collaboration-Sep-2010 | Collaboration Meeting]] (Five 25-min sessions allocated), some topics...
 
#* SiPM report
 
#* Bcal construction
 
#* Fcal construction
 
#* Preparations at USM
 
#* Decisions: Fcal insert, monitoring/calibration
 
  
 
= Minutes =
 
= Minutes =
 +
Attendees:Beni, John, Elton, Tim, Fernando, Eugene, Yi (JLab); Zisis (UofR); Will (USM)
 +
 +
# Announcements
 +
#* Report on calibration from Athens scheduled for next Thu at the cal working group meeting.
 +
# Review of Action Items
 +
# Update - USM
 +
#* Will has started drafting a sow, beginning with clearly defining the division of responsibilities between JLab and USM. Preliminary notes in the form of a table listing the tasks have been sent to Elton for feedback.
 +
# [[SiPM Radiation Hardness Test]]  (Update from Yi)
 +
#* Samples have been irradiated at different temperatures, and they are in the recovery phase.
 +
#* Recovery is strongly temperature dependent, with recovery at 60 degrees almost complete after a couple of days. Recover at 0deg very slow, no change in the same time period.
 +
#* Preliminary conclusions: recovery is about as expected; gain by cooling 15 deg is 2.6 vs 3.1.
 +
# Electronics/cooling
 +
# Geometry and light guides
 +
# Simulation runs

Latest revision as of 14:19, 24 September 2010

Teleconference Time: 11:00 a.m. EST

  • ESNET and EVO session
  • Phone in CC L207 is 757-269-7084
  • Phone:
    • +1-800-377-8846 : US
    • +1-888-276-7715 : Canada
    • +1-302-709-8424 : International
    • then enter participant code: 77438230# (remember the "#"). Phone connection only upon request.

Items for followup from previous meeting

  1. Collect this information of testing (including goals and setup) on the wiki for ease of presenting information. (USM)
  2. Will to update statement of work for USM contract and develop detailed schedule. Draft in progress.

Documents to Review

Tentative Agenda

  1. Announcements
  2. Review of Action Items
  3. Update - USM
  4. SiPM Radiation Hardness Test (Update from Yi)
  5. Electronics/cooling
  6. Geometry and light guides
  7. Simulation runs

Minutes

Attendees:Beni, John, Elton, Tim, Fernando, Eugene, Yi (JLab); Zisis (UofR); Will (USM)

  1. Announcements
    • Report on calibration from Athens scheduled for next Thu at the cal working group meeting.
  2. Review of Action Items
  3. Update - USM
    • Will has started drafting a sow, beginning with clearly defining the division of responsibilities between JLab and USM. Preliminary notes in the form of a table listing the tasks have been sent to Elton for feedback.
  4. SiPM Radiation Hardness Test (Update from Yi)
    • Samples have been irradiated at different temperatures, and they are in the recovery phase.
    • Recovery is strongly temperature dependent, with recovery at 60 degrees almost complete after a couple of days. Recover at 0deg very slow, no change in the same time period.
    • Preliminary conclusions: recovery is about as expected; gain by cooling 15 deg is 2.6 vs 3.1.
  5. Electronics/cooling
  6. Geometry and light guides
  7. Simulation runs