Difference between revisions of "Electronics Testing Readiness Review Checklist"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Topics for Discussion)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The goal of the Electronics  Readiness Review is to assess whether the University of Indiana is ready to begin production of the fabrication of the Hall D forward calorimeter modules. Specifically the following questions need to be examined:
+
The goal of the Electronics  Readiness Review is to assess whether the University of Indiana is ready to begin production of the fabrication of the Hall D forward calorimeter modules.
 +
 
 +
=Topics for Discussion=
  
 
# Environment
 
# Environment
−
## General
+
#* Are the MSDS information sheets available for all products used during production?
−
##* Are the MSDS information sheets available for all products used during production?
+
#* What support do you get from university EH&S services?
−
##* What support do you get from university EH&S services?
+
#* Are there any materials (e.g cleaning agents/etc) that are of particular hazard during fabrication
−
##* Are there any materials (e.g cleaning agents/etc) that are of particular hazard during fabrication
+
 
# Procedures:
 
# Procedures:
−
## Are all procedures for accepting fabricated parts documented?
+
#* Are all procedures for accepting fabricated parts documented?
−
## Are all procedures for assembling components documented?
+
#* Are all procedures for assembling components documented?
−
## Guidance should be given for each of the steps in the fabrication procedure for ease of estimating completion times.
+
 
# Training:
 
# Training:
−
## What are the training procedures for first-time workers in each of the areas where they will work?
+
#* What are the training procedures for first-time workers in each of the areas where they will work?
−
## How is this documented?
+
#* How is this documented?
−
# Acceptance Testing
+
−
## Lead glass
+
−
##* Are the testing procedures clearly defined?
+
−
##* Is the criteria for rejecting glass blocks clearly specified?
+
−
##* How is the location of each block recorded?
+
−
## PMT
+
−
##* How are the dimension tolerances checked on pmts?
+
−
##* How is the performance checked?
+
−
##* What performance characteristics are recorded?
+
−
## Cockcroft-Walton base
+
−
##* How are electrical components qualified?
+
−
##* How are electrical boards qualified?
+
−
##* How are the assembled boards checked?
+
−
##* How is the complete assembly tested?
+
−
##* How are noise sources characterized?
+
−
##* What are the acceptance tests at each stage of the process?
+
−
## Machined parts
+
−
##* What acceptance will be performed to verify dimensional tolerances of all features of the machined parts?
+
−
## Assembly
+
−
##* How are the mechanical tolerances checked after assembly?
+
−
##* What documentation is recorded for each module?
+
 
# Recovery Procedures
 
# Recovery Procedures
−
## What are the procedures for reporting an anomally in measurements during the assembly?
+
#* What are the procedures for reporting an anomaly in measurements during the assembly?
−
## What are the procedures for rectifying any problems encountered during assembly? Is this documented?
+
−
# Acceptance Testing of completed module
+
−
## Are all the items listed in Section 4.2 of the SOW addressed in the Quality Assurance and Test Plan Document?
+
−
## Are any of the completed modules going to be tested with a source to check overall operation?
+
 
# Tracking
 
# Tracking
−
## Are all travelers specified for the project?
+
#* Are all travelers specified for the project?
−
## What information is recorded for the lead glass?
+
#* What information is recorded for each board?
−
## What information is recorded for the pmt?
+
−
## What information is recorded for each of the fabricated parts
+
−
## What information is recorded during assembly?
+
 
# Schedule
 
# Schedule
−
## How is the schedule tracked?
+
#* How is the schedule tracked?
−
## Note: Time for completion of a module should be revisited after the start of production of each subcomponent.
+
#* Note: Time for completion of a module should be revisited after the start of production.
 
# Reporting
 
# Reporting
−
## Is the reporting chain to the project clear?
+
#* Is the reporting chain to the project clear?
 +
 
 +
= Requirements, Quality Assurance, and Preparation for Delivery: Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Statement of Work =
 +
 
 +
==2. REQUIREMENTS==
 +
 
 +
2.1. MATERIALS
 +
 
 +
The fADC250 and the F1TDC modules shall be as specified in the design
 +
documentation.
 +
 
 +
2.2. CONFLICTS
 +
 
 +
Any inconsistencies or discrepancies in the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules are to
 +
be brought to the attention of JLab for resolution prior to the commencement or
 +
continuation of the testing program. Under no circumstance is UMass to proceed
 +
without JLab approval.
 +
 
 +
2.3. MARKING
 +
 
 +
All the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules are marked with serial numbers. UMass
 +
shall maintain records traceable to accepted and tested modules.
 +
 
 +
2.4. INSPECTION
 +
 
 +
All inspections required to ensure the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules meet all the
 +
requirements as stated in the test protocol documentation shall be performed,
 +
recorded, and then provided to JLab.
 +
 
 +
==3. QUALITY ASSURANCE==
 +
 
 +
3.1 UMass shall prepare a Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan for JLab’s
 +
approval and shall furnish such documentation as JLab may require throughout the
 +
acceptance and testing process. UMass shall conduct quality control procedures and
 +
tests, which will guarantee that the product to be furnished by UMass is in full
 +
conformance with this statement of work.
 +
 
 +
3.2 This Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan must include the following:
  
−
== Contract Requirements ==
+
3.2.1 A Process Quality Plan, comprised of:
−
# Final Construction Plan
+
−
# Final Quality Assurance Plan and Acceptance Test Plan.
+
  
−
== Requirements and Quality Assurance: Section 3 and 4 of the Statement of Work ==
+
a. Step-by-step process documents, with instructions and diagrams pertaining
 +
to each testing assembly and/or testing step.<br>
 +
b. Safety information for the job operator, including material data safety
 +
sheets where applicable.<br>
 +
c. A method of documenting and reporting any defects found during
 +
assembly and/or testing of the boards.<br>
 +
d. A mechanism for recording all job operator work sessions.<br>
 +
e. The submittal to JLab of all data related to the above.<br>
  
−
The vendor shall prepare a Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan for approval by JLab at the Readiness Review.  The following items must be included:
+
3.2.2 Final Acceptance Test Plan, based on the documents listed in Section 2.
−
=== QA and Acceptance Test Plan (Section 4.2.1) ===
+
  
−
==A Component Inspection Plan, comprised of==  
+
==4. PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY==
−
# Inspection of all materials received from the vendor’s suppliers and subcontractors and the recording of this information.
+
−
# Obtaining and recording of all material certifications and analyses.
+
−
# The calibration and identification of standards and instrumentation used for testing; the intervals between calibrations are also to be defined.
+
−
# Establishment of inspection points for the incoming components, which will measure critical parameters.
+
−
# The recording of all inspection data in such a manner so that the history of a component can be readily traced.
+
−
# The submittal to JLab of all data related to the above.
+
  
−
==A Process Quality Plan, comprised of==
+
4.1. SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS
−
# Step-by-step process documents, with instructions and prints pertaining to each assembly and/or manufacturing step.
+
UMass shall ship the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules properly packed, to ensure that
−
# Safety information for the job operator, including material data safety sheets
+
damage is not incurred during shipment, in accordance with transportation industry
−
# A method of reporting any mechanical defects found during assembly of components.
+
standards.
−
# A mechanism for recording all job operator work sessions.
+
−
# The submittal to JLab of all data related to the above.
+
  
−
==Final Acceptance Test Plan, comprised of==
+
4.2. PACKAGING
−
# Acceptance of the PMTs based on their response to a nominal light source.
+
−
# Acceptance of the PMT bases using electrical tests.
+
−
# Acceptance of the lead glass bars based on their transparency and visual inspection for cracks, chips, or bubbles..
+
−
# Acceptance of the PMT-base-light guide assembly based on dimensional tests.
+
  
−
===Tracking ===
+
4.3. Packaging shall be such as to properly support and contain the equipment and further
−
The vendor must keep a record (travelers) of all raw materials and inspections that are used in the construction of each module, and document the procedures followed during fabrication.
+
protect against the elements. Sizing shall be such that handling is facilitated and weight
 +
limitations imposed by the transportation industry can readily be met.

Latest revision as of 13:07, 14 September 2012

The goal of the Electronics Readiness Review is to assess whether the University of Indiana is ready to begin production of the fabrication of the Hall D forward calorimeter modules.

Topics for Discussion

  1. Environment
    • Are the MSDS information sheets available for all products used during production?
    • What support do you get from university EH&S services?
    • Are there any materials (e.g cleaning agents/etc) that are of particular hazard during fabrication
  2. Procedures:
    • Are all procedures for accepting fabricated parts documented?
    • Are all procedures for assembling components documented?
  3. Training:
    • What are the training procedures for first-time workers in each of the areas where they will work?
    • How is this documented?
  4. Recovery Procedures
    • What are the procedures for reporting an anomaly in measurements during the assembly?
  5. Tracking
    • Are all travelers specified for the project?
    • What information is recorded for each board?
  6. Schedule
    • How is the schedule tracked?
    • Note: Time for completion of a module should be revisited after the start of production.
  7. Reporting
    • Is the reporting chain to the project clear?

Requirements, Quality Assurance, and Preparation for Delivery: Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Statement of Work

2. REQUIREMENTS

2.1. MATERIALS

The fADC250 and the F1TDC modules shall be as specified in the design documentation.

2.2. CONFLICTS

Any inconsistencies or discrepancies in the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules are to be brought to the attention of JLab for resolution prior to the commencement or continuation of the testing program. Under no circumstance is UMass to proceed without JLab approval.

2.3. MARKING

All the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules are marked with serial numbers. UMass shall maintain records traceable to accepted and tested modules.

2.4. INSPECTION

All inspections required to ensure the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules meet all the requirements as stated in the test protocol documentation shall be performed, recorded, and then provided to JLab.

3. QUALITY ASSURANCE

3.1 UMass shall prepare a Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan for JLab’s approval and shall furnish such documentation as JLab may require throughout the acceptance and testing process. UMass shall conduct quality control procedures and tests, which will guarantee that the product to be furnished by UMass is in full conformance with this statement of work.

3.2 This Quality Assurance and Acceptance Test Plan must include the following:

3.2.1 A Process Quality Plan, comprised of:

a. Step-by-step process documents, with instructions and diagrams pertaining to each testing assembly and/or testing step.
b. Safety information for the job operator, including material data safety sheets where applicable.
c. A method of documenting and reporting any defects found during assembly and/or testing of the boards.
d. A mechanism for recording all job operator work sessions.
e. The submittal to JLab of all data related to the above.

3.2.2 Final Acceptance Test Plan, based on the documents listed in Section 2.

4. PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY

4.1. SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS UMass shall ship the fADC250 and the F1TDC modules properly packed, to ensure that damage is not incurred during shipment, in accordance with transportation industry standards.

4.2. PACKAGING

4.3. Packaging shall be such as to properly support and contain the equipment and further protect against the elements. Sizing shall be such that handling is facilitated and weight limitations imposed by the transportation industry can readily be met.

Retrieved from "https://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Electronics_Testing_Readiness_Review_Checklist&oldid=40085"