|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | | | |
| | = Minutes = | | = Minutes = |
| − | ''Attending: Ettore, Elton, George, Tim, Jonathan, Elliott | + | ''Attending: |
| − | | + | |
| − | # Discussion of implication of cable-in-conduit conductor (CICC) choice on infrastructure in four main areas
| + | |
| − | ## Power supply. Current ~ 15KA, voltage 5-10 V. (Could existing power supply 3KA/10V be converted to 6KA/5V?)
| + | |
| − | ##* Elton can obtain cost estimates for this power supply
| + | |
| − | ## Cryogenic plant
| + | |
| − | ##* Primary circuit: Forced flow He at 4.5K, < 10g/s, ~5-10 bar, pressure drop < 2 bar.
| + | |
| − | ##* Secondary circuit: Deliver intermediate temperature He gas at 20-70 K to HTS vapor cooled current leads
| + | |
| − | ##* Jonathan will investigate feasibility/cost of modifying existing refrigerator or purchasing new to deliver these requirements
| + | |
| − | ## High-current HTS (17KA) vapor cooled leads
| + | |
| − | ##* Ettore will provide this information based on Sultan design
| + | |
| − | ## Fast protection system (external), with response time of ~0.5 s.
| + | |
| − | ##* Commercial 4 parallel breakers 5KA each (20KA total), 2KV max. Two independent systems for redundancy
| + | |
| − | ##* Ettore will obtain details of these existing systems.
| + | |
| − | # Jonathan will provide details of the cryo plant to Ettore
| + | |
| − | # George mentioned that the G0 CICC conductor may have been operated at reduced pressure and lower current, which may be more compatible with standard JLab operation.
| + | |
