Difference between revisions of "TODO reprocessing 2017-01 data"

From GlueXWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Would like to do)
(Need to do)
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
* Recalibrate inner FCAL blocks
 
* Recalibrate inner FCAL blocks
 +
** Igal says that if we keep the same 2 calibration periods, he is ready to recalibrate and this should take maybe a couple of weeks
 +
*** Gains (2 tables)
 +
**** 93676  2017-11-16 10-03-20    2017-11-16 10-03-20    default        30000L-30788L
 +
**** 84661  2017-11-07 21-46-51    2017-11-07 21-46-51    default        30789L-inf
 +
*** Pedestals (3 tables)
 +
**** 55748  2017-04-04 08-31-43    2017-04-04 08-31-43    default        30992L-inf     
 +
**** 55747  2017-04-04 08-30-47    2017-04-04 08-30-47    default        30400L-30991L 
 +
**** 55746  2017-04-04 08-30-23    2017-04-04 08-30-23    default        30000L-30399L 
 +
*** Timing offsets (1 table)
 +
**** 82585  2017-10-27 12-55-09    2017-10-27 12-55-09    default        30000L-inf
 
** Decide if we should use the Primex calibration procedure
 
** Decide if we should use the Primex calibration procedure
 +
** Also decide if we should use log-weighted or weighted mean (current default) position
 +
** Igal: Simon is working on finalizing the Island reconstruction algorithm - maybe we want to use this instead
 
* Check tagger calibrations
 
* Check tagger calibrations
 
* Benchmark reconstruction software against 2019-11 software version
 
* Benchmark reconstruction software against 2019-11 software version
Line 14: Line 26:
 
* study matching to single FCAL blocks
 
* study matching to single FCAL blocks
 
* detailed tagger energy calibration
 
* detailed tagger energy calibration
[[File:Tagger energy calibration 2017.PNG|200px|thumb|right|Beam energy reconstructed with exclusive rho events]]
+
[[File:Tagger energy calibration 2017.PNG|350px|thumb|right|Beam energy reconstructed with exclusive rho events]]
 
* better calibration of high energy FCAL showers
 
* better calibration of high energy FCAL showers
  

Revision as of 09:05, 28 June 2022

Things to do before reprocessing the 2017 data with the latest software

Need to do

  • Recalibrate inner FCAL blocks
    • Igal says that if we keep the same 2 calibration periods, he is ready to recalibrate and this should take maybe a couple of weeks
      • Gains (2 tables)
        • 93676 2017-11-16 10-03-20 2017-11-16 10-03-20 default 30000L-30788L
        • 84661 2017-11-07 21-46-51 2017-11-07 21-46-51 default 30789L-inf
      • Pedestals (3 tables)
        • 55748 2017-04-04 08-31-43 2017-04-04 08-31-43 default 30992L-inf
        • 55747 2017-04-04 08-30-47 2017-04-04 08-30-47 default 30400L-30991L
        • 55746 2017-04-04 08-30-23 2017-04-04 08-30-23 default 30000L-30399L
      • Timing offsets (1 table)
        • 82585 2017-10-27 12-55-09 2017-10-27 12-55-09 default 30000L-inf
    • Decide if we should use the Primex calibration procedure
    • Also decide if we should use log-weighted or weighted mean (current default) position
    • Igal: Simon is working on finalizing the Island reconstruction algorithm - maybe we want to use this instead
  • Check tagger calibrations
  • Benchmark reconstruction software against 2019-11 software version

Would like to do

  • Figure out drift chamber alignment
  • study matching to single FCAL blocks
  • detailed tagger energy calibration
Beam energy reconstructed with exclusive rho events
  • better calibration of high energy FCAL showers

FCAL plots

pi0 mass for inner blocks in run period 2017-01 (run 30730) - 25 April 2022 (pdf)

InnerBlocks 30730-20220425.png

pi0 mass for inner blocks in run period 2018-08 (run 51227) - 25 April 2022 (pdf)

InnerBlocks 51227-20220425.png

pi0 mass for inner blocks In run period 2017-01 (note that these plots were made using the pi0 skims, whereas the above plots were made with the full raw data, so ignore this plot!! the pi0 skims explicitly rejected in the inner FCAL layers)- 20 April 2022

InnerBlocks-2017-01 20220420.png