Difference between revisions of "Single photon reconstruction efficiency"
From GlueXWiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Comparison of [http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mikornic/GlueX/fcal/NewFDCdesign/g1_reconstruction_FDC2.eps single photon reconstruction efficiency] as a function of generated polar angle between old and new detector design. Photons were generated | Comparison of [http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mikornic/GlueX/fcal/NewFDCdesign/g1_reconstruction_FDC2.eps single photon reconstruction efficiency] as a function of generated polar angle between old and new detector design. Photons were generated | ||
| − | in full azimuth from the center of the | + | in full azimuth from the center of the target with energies from 0.05 to 5.0 GeV (in steps of 100 MeV). |
| + | MC information provided that the single cluster was reconstructed from the photon that did not convert before the FCAL. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comparison between the [http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~mikornic/GlueX/fcal/NewFDCdesign/g1_FDC1_FDC2.eps FDC option 1 and option 2] of new design. | ||
Revision as of 12:53, 5 June 2007
Comparison of single photon reconstruction efficiency as a function of generated polar angle between old and new detector design. Photons were generated in full azimuth from the center of the target with energies from 0.05 to 5.0 GeV (in steps of 100 MeV). MC information provided that the single cluster was reconstructed from the photon that did not convert before the FCAL.
Comparison between the FDC option 1 and option 2 of new design.
