https://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Run_Coordinator_report:_fall_2022_w5&feed=atom&action=historyRun Coordinator report: fall 2022 w5 - Revision history2024-03-28T16:55:23ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.24.1https://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Run_Coordinator_report:_fall_2022_w5&diff=116214&oldid=prevIjaegle at 19:18, 28 September 20222022-09-28T19:18:14Z<p></p>
<table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'>
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 19:18, 28 September 2022</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Full target & ~1.4B with Empty target. Roughly ~45% of week 5 photon-flux corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup apart from the FCAL bases frequent failures or anticipated failure. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency, 35%, due to issues with the injector and RF cavity. Whenever we had beam, the beam quality was usually good except the last of week 5 when a shoulder in the vertical direction appears in a wire scan (HARP scan). Another issue with the beam is its frequent excursions in the y-direction, particularly after a trip. The causes of the excursions are only partially understood by a software glitch. A new monitoring plugin has been included in the RootSpy which allows monitoring basic distributions related to the Primakoff-eta analysis.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Full target & ~1.4B with Empty target. Roughly ~45% of week 5 photon-flux corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup apart from the FCAL bases frequent failures or anticipated failure. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency, 35%, due to issues with the injector and RF cavity. Whenever we had beam, the beam quality was usually good except the last <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">day </ins>of week 5 when a shoulder in the vertical direction appears in a wire scan (HARP scan). Another issue with the beam is its frequent excursions in the y-direction, particularly after a trip. The causes of the excursions are only partially understood by a software glitch. A new monitoring plugin has been included in the RootSpy which allows monitoring basic distributions related to the Primakoff-eta analysis.</div></td></tr>
</table>Ijaeglehttps://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Run_Coordinator_report:_fall_2022_w5&diff=116210&oldid=prevIjaegle at 17:22, 28 September 20222022-09-28T17:22:31Z<p></p>
<table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'>
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 17:22, 28 September 2022</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Full target & ~1.4B with Empty target. Roughly ~45% of week 5 photon-flux corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup apart from the FCAL bases frequent failures or anticipated failure. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency, 35%, due to issues with the injector and RF cavity. Whenever we had beam, the beam quality was usually good except the last of week 5 when a shoulder in the vertical direction appears in a wire scan (HARP scan). Another issue with the beam is its frequent excursions in the y-direction, particularly after a trip. The causes of the excursions are only partially understood by a software glitch.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Full target & ~1.4B with Empty target. Roughly ~45% of week 5 photon-flux corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup apart from the FCAL bases frequent failures or anticipated failure. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency, 35%, due to issues with the injector and RF cavity. Whenever we had beam, the beam quality was usually good except the last of week 5 when a shoulder in the vertical direction appears in a wire scan (HARP scan). Another issue with the beam is its frequent excursions in the y-direction, particularly after a trip. The causes of the excursions are only partially understood by a software glitch<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">. A new monitoring plugin has been included in the RootSpy which allows monitoring basic distributions related to the Primakoff-eta analysis</ins>.</div></td></tr>
</table>Ijaeglehttps://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Run_Coordinator_report:_fall_2022_w5&diff=116209&oldid=prevIjaegle at 17:20, 28 September 20222022-09-28T17:20:24Z<p></p>
<table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'>
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 17:20, 28 September 2022</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Full target & ~1.4B with Empty target. Roughly ~45% of week 5 photon-flux corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency, 35%, due to issues with the injector and RF cavity. Whenever we had beam, the beam quality was usually good except the last of week 5 when a shoulder in the vertical direction appears in a wire scan (HARP scan). Another issue with the beam is its frequent excursions in the y-direction, particularly after a trip. The causes of the excursions are only partially understood by a software glitch.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Full target & ~1.4B with Empty target. Roughly ~45% of week 5 photon-flux corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">apart from the FCAL bases frequent failures or anticipated failure</ins>. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency, 35%, due to issues with the injector and RF cavity. Whenever we had beam, the beam quality was usually good except the last of week 5 when a shoulder in the vertical direction appears in a wire scan (HARP scan). Another issue with the beam is its frequent excursions in the y-direction, particularly after a trip. The causes of the excursions are only partially understood by a software glitch.</div></td></tr>
</table>Ijaeglehttps://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Run_Coordinator_report:_fall_2022_w5&diff=116208&oldid=prevIjaegle at 17:18, 28 September 20222022-09-28T17:18:40Z<p></p>
<table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'>
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 17:18, 28 September 2022</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Fill </del>target & ~1.4B with Empty target. ~45% of week 5 corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency due <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">issue </del>with the injector <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">orbits </del>and RF cavity.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Full </ins>target & ~1.4B with Empty target. <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Roughly </ins>~45% of week 5 <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">photon-flux </ins>corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">, 35%, </ins>due <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">to issues </ins>with the injector and RF cavity<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">. Whenever we had beam, the beam quality was usually good except the last of week 5 when a shoulder in the vertical direction appears in a wire scan (HARP scan). Another issue with the beam is its frequent excursions in the y-direction, particularly after a trip. The causes of the excursions are only partially understood by a software glitch</ins>.</div></td></tr>
</table>Ijaeglehttps://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Run_Coordinator_report:_fall_2022_w5&diff=116207&oldid=prevIjaegle: Created page with "During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Fill target & ~1.4B with Empty target. ~45% of week 5 corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the set..."2022-09-28T17:09:16Z<p>Created page with "During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Fill target & ~1.4B with Empty target. ~45% of week 5 corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the set..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>During this week 5, we collected ~7.8B triggers with Fill target & ~1.4B with Empty target. ~45% of week 5 corresponds to empty target. There were no issues concerning the setup. There were the usual DAQ crashes which represented the majority of downtime from our side. The major issue this week came from poor accelerator efficiency due issue with the injector orbits and RF cavity.</div>Ijaegle