Difference between revisions of "JEF meeting, June 3, 2022"
From GlueXWiki
(→Minutes) |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Simulations/Analysis | * Simulations/Analysis | ||
− | * Preparation | + | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/0/01/Background_update_060322.pdf Background simulation update]-- Simon |
+ | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/9/94/Glue-jefxd-igal-jaegle-03022022.pdf eta to ggpi0 update] -- ig | ||
+ | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5405 diphoton separation plots (files tagged as 'MAY30')] -- Tegan | ||
+ | * Preparation of parts for FCAL2 modules -- Sasha | ||
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/budget/students1.xlsx Status of Summer Students (2022) ] | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/budget/students1.xlsx Status of Summer Students (2022) ] | ||
+ | *** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/module_fabrication/students_2022/imagejpeg_0.jpg Visiting Hall D ] | ||
+ | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/crystals/delivered/SICCAS/siccas_nps.xlsx QA check of NPS SICCAScrystals] | ||
+ | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/module_fabrication/wrapped/wrapped_crytur.pdf Status of wrapping CRYTUR crystals] | ||
+ | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/module_fabrication/status/part_preparation.pdf Parts for module fabrication] | ||
* Module fabrication -- Sasha | * Module fabrication -- Sasha | ||
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/module_fabrication/status/fcal_fabrication.pdf Status of fabrication ] | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/module_fabrication/status/fcal_fabrication.pdf Status of fabrication ] | ||
Line 13: | Line 20: | ||
** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/module_fabrication/status/5_6_22/modules_in_tedf_5_6_22.jpg Fabricated modules in TEDF ] | ** [https://halldweb.jlab.org/detectors/fcal2/module_fabrication/status/5_6_22/modules_in_tedf_5_6_22.jpg Fabricated modules in TEDF ] | ||
* Light Monitoring System -- Arshak | * Light Monitoring System -- Arshak | ||
+ | |||
+ | =Minutes= | ||
+ | Attendees: Sasha,Bill,Liping,Phil,Olga,Jon,Igal,Daniel,Tegan,Susan,Jane,Arshak,Jaden,Dax,Vadim,Jared,Adam,Gavin,S.T. | ||
+ | * S.T. gave an update on simulation of the π0π0 background for η→π0γγ | ||
+ | ** Goal is to understand the shape and scale of the background | ||
+ | ** New generator genScalarRegge with parameters tuned to existing FCAL2 data | ||
+ | ** Use to estimate background for FCAL2 in anticipation of possible submission to PAC next year | ||
+ | * Igal has been looking at shower seperations between π0 and bachelor γ for the golden JEF channel | ||
+ | ** Finds different distributions depending on how the decay post-processor evtgen is used | ||
+ | ** Some evidence that shower shape in Island Algorithm (IA) for lead glass blocks may not be correct | ||
+ | ** The default (DA) shower reconstruction algorithm does not work well when the showers are too close | ||
+ | ** The Island algorithm reproduces reasonably well the thrown separation when using the center-of-gravity (actually a fitted position) | ||
+ | ** The log-weighting method fails for close clusters for both algorithms, with a pronounced peak near zero separation for IA | ||
+ | ** Compared IA and default algorithm reconstruction of π0γγ relative to η→3π0 background | ||
+ | *** Peak in simulation at η mass looks sharper for FCAL2 compared to FCAL1 | ||
+ | *** TOF veto reduces signal by factor of 4 but does suppress η→2γ peaking background | ||
+ | * Tegan showed some shower separation plots from his di-photon studies | ||
+ | ** Confirmed poor performance of log-weighting method for position if the clusters are too close | ||
+ | ** IA works better than DA for center-of-gravity position method | ||
+ | ** Could in principle check IA using real data in CCAL following Ilya's scheme for mixing events used for PrimeX | ||
+ | * No news regarding moving FCAL2 module fabrication setup to new building | ||
+ | * Olga delivered a batch of cookies from GWU | ||
+ | * PRs can now proceed: PMT sockets, integrating sphere | ||
+ | * Got permission to move CRYTUR crystals from JLab pool to us | ||
+ | * Students now at lab working on various stages of module fabrication, encouraged to give updates at this meeting | ||
+ | ** Checked 112 NPS replacement (SICCAS) crystals for color, bubbles, dimensions | ||
+ | ** Work on wrapping, cutting ESR/Tedlar,etc. | ||
+ | * Need to glue/wrap light guides (1127 needed) | ||
+ | * Grand total of 459 modules fabricated |
Latest revision as of 10:51, 6 June 2022
meeting time and location
- 9:30 am EST (JLab time) remote only
- Zoom meeting ID: 161 050 9142 Passcode: 004965
Agenda
- Simulations/Analysis
- Background simulation update-- Simon
- eta to ggpi0 update -- ig
- diphoton separation plots (files tagged as 'MAY30') -- Tegan
- Preparation of parts for FCAL2 modules -- Sasha
- Module fabrication -- Sasha
- Light Monitoring System -- Arshak
Minutes
Attendees: Sasha,Bill,Liping,Phil,Olga,Jon,Igal,Daniel,Tegan,Susan,Jane,Arshak,Jaden,Dax,Vadim,Jared,Adam,Gavin,S.T.
- S.T. gave an update on simulation of the π0π0 background for η→π0γγ
- Goal is to understand the shape and scale of the background
- New generator genScalarRegge with parameters tuned to existing FCAL2 data
- Use to estimate background for FCAL2 in anticipation of possible submission to PAC next year
- Igal has been looking at shower seperations between π0 and bachelor γ for the golden JEF channel
- Finds different distributions depending on how the decay post-processor evtgen is used
- Some evidence that shower shape in Island Algorithm (IA) for lead glass blocks may not be correct
- The default (DA) shower reconstruction algorithm does not work well when the showers are too close
- The Island algorithm reproduces reasonably well the thrown separation when using the center-of-gravity (actually a fitted position)
- The log-weighting method fails for close clusters for both algorithms, with a pronounced peak near zero separation for IA
- Compared IA and default algorithm reconstruction of π0γγ relative to η→3π0 background
- Peak in simulation at η mass looks sharper for FCAL2 compared to FCAL1
- TOF veto reduces signal by factor of 4 but does suppress η→2γ peaking background
- Tegan showed some shower separation plots from his di-photon studies
- Confirmed poor performance of log-weighting method for position if the clusters are too close
- IA works better than DA for center-of-gravity position method
- Could in principle check IA using real data in CCAL following Ilya's scheme for mixing events used for PrimeX
- No news regarding moving FCAL2 module fabrication setup to new building
- Olga delivered a batch of cookies from GWU
- PRs can now proceed: PMT sockets, integrating sphere
- Got permission to move CRYTUR crystals from JLab pool to us
- Students now at lab working on various stages of module fabrication, encouraged to give updates at this meeting
- Checked 112 NPS replacement (SICCAS) crystals for color, bubbles, dimensions
- Work on wrapping, cutting ESR/Tedlar,etc.
- Need to glue/wrap light guides (1127 needed)
- Grand total of 459 modules fabricated